.... there is a Harley race heritage that exceeds any other bike on the planet. Harley for me is about twins that can really post some numbers and may even go around corners.
When? If they made a good bike in 1923, then great - doesn't really give their 2010 offerings any credibility.
My mate's grandfather used to do stuff like fit Norton heads onto Harley bottom ends (and jam them into open wheel racing cars). Even when he was doing this in the 1960s, he reckoned the only benefit the Harley engines offered was swept volume... Everyone else has move further than HD in the last 50 years - and not many of them began with something as technically flawed as a 60* V-twin.
If you think that they're cool, then great.
And I'll agree with you, if you talk about how good their pre-war and immediately post-war offerings were, by the standards of the day.
But a performance Harley by 2010 standards, is polishing a turd.
Buell made some cool & fast bikes for sure, but they were mostly impressive thanks to the techniques used to get those turds shining. The fact that there is no longer a Buell motorcycles says a lot, GFC or no.
More SouthPark:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZ5w-IwEHO8&feature=related