Hi Guys,
The poor old Boost Bottle cops a lot of flak - it never claimed to be a universal panacea.
Garry Treadwell is right, they do work and they do what was claimed. The Hiemholtz Reservoir is a simple device that recognises that there are [undeniable] pressure variations in the intact tract of a two stroke engine and aims to enable external tuning of those pressure waves. Nobody ever claimed massive horsepower increases, all they were ever claimed to do was to smooth out the throttle response in certain rev ranges.
Its a bit much to compare them to a V-Force reed - hardly comparing apples against apples. Their benefits don't show up on a dyno [as many other beneficial engine power characteristic don't either], it is just a 'feel' thing. History is full of successful race teams ignoring supposedly superior dyno charts and winning with engines that have the right 'feel' that enables the rider to perform the way they want to. It is a lesson [for example] that Honda constantly fails to learn unless their current top rider has the clout to direct their energies in productive directions - think Mick Doohan and Valentino Rossi. It's one of the things that makes motorcycling more of an engineering challenge than auto racing.
The other funny thing is that the old Boost Bottle probably added $2.00 to the cost of the bike, didn't compromise reliability, didn't add any significant complications or weight.
Personally I think the poor old Boost Bottle has been very badly treated by history. I think we should lobby the authorities to have it rightfully acknowledged as a true '70s wacky invention. Long live the boost bottle.
Yours in wacky inventions
VMX42