In a perfect world, Evo would be as stated, no linkage rear suspension, air cooled and drum brakes. I've been racing in the Evo class in three states over the last 10 years and have seen HUNDREDS (thousands) of bikes at meetings and have only seen one bike which I considers wrong, and it was a 1982 CR480RC Honda with 2 shocks welded on the back. WRONG.
Glenn Bell won the 2004 Nationals at Conondale on a KX250A5 with a flat slide carby and 43mm forks and to me that's fine, who gives a shit. If we can just come up with a set of rules that can retain the "Spirit of the Era" the world would be a fantastic place.
I've gotta go, the Popes coming over for tea and I'm cooking.
Whats your take on the "Spirit of the Era" Magoo?
And which era of Evo you refer too, remembering that CZ made a bike in '91 that can race in this class?
Is it the late 70's? The early 80's?
What exactly are you wanting in the rules?
Let us know where you think the line should be drawn. Tell us some parts that you think are in the "Spirit of the Era" and what you think about a '78 RM400 up against a '83 CR500 (Husky)? What can be done to the RM to get it up to the standard of the CR? (brakes, suspension, handling, power)?
These are just questions, by no means am I trying to stir shit, but just trying to understand where you or any other forum member (for that matter) stand on the "Spirit of Era" and what "parts" are acceptable to put on an Evo bike?