But that's the thing Nathan, you've got it all arse about...
It's not up to us to convince you that Pre 90 shouldn't be included.
It's not even up to you to convince us that Pre 90 should be included. (although that may help your case)
It's up to you to convince the Promoter (of whichever event) that Pre 90 should be included. Whether that be Classic Dirt, or the average VMX or Vinduro.
And so far all you've done both here and in the VERI discussion is throw about platitudes, hearsay, and innuendo.
If any of us were running Classic Dirt as a business, how would your business case justify excluding pre-90?
All Promoters (even clubs) run events as a business these days Nathan. And again you have it all arse about. Classic Dirt is a successful event. The Promoters don't need to do a CBA to justify excluding Pre 90. Not when the status quo works and is profitable. It's up to the proponents of Pre 90 to provide a CBA/Business Case to justify including Pre 90.
And if you're going to start talking business cases, then you (yes, you, not the Promoters) should be looking to present a real CBA, backed by real analysis and with verifiable and auditable figures, not just wishy-washy platitudes that "it'll all be better if you let us ride!"
You keep referring to logic Nathan, and yet you persist in presenting emotive dribble that bears little or no resemblance to logic.
Do try and remember that you're the one that has to prove his case, we're not required to disprove it. Just because you say something at every opportunity does not make it so.
(CBA = Cost-Benefit Analysis)