As a bemused bystander I find this one a bit hard to follow. I don't know Cheapracer at all, but like anyone on here he's welcome to delete or lock his thread if he wishes. It's not some kind of rigid autocracy here. It'd be better if people didn't but hey, sometimes things just go pear-shaped.
Now, Cheapracer does bite too quickly, but as far as I can see, all he's done is suggest that he make some decent copies of what I suppose is an uncommon and expensive frame so as to open up the possibility that more old Pommy bikes appear on the grid. Not unreasonable, and no different to what GMC and a few others do. The frame, while of modern manufacture, would be a faithful replica (he claims) of the original, so it's well within the spirit of things, surely?
I'm beat if I can see why all the angst, other than the fact that the guy tends to fan the flames with his responses. What exactly is everyone's beef? Do you honestly disagree with the proposition? Why? Or do you just dislike the guy for the way he comes across (sort of like poor old Ji). Or is there some history here I am unaware of?
I reckon just lighten up...