I see he did this to save weight, it would be interesting to start weighing tanks to see what is really saved.
I have a YZ C tank and it comes in at 1.6 Kg
Any one got a TM tank to weigh?
3kg on the b'room scales, GMC.
Not a lot of wt saving there, but at the risk of opening a can of worms, the 190lbs may not be as far fetched as it seems.
Larry Watkins built 197 lb stock frame 360 RT2M back in the day & the TM engine is considerably lighter than an RT2 engine. Also, it maybe a TS250 frame which are somewhat lighter than TM frames.
Having a TS250 frame & engine (w the rack-&-pinion clutch cover) in the shed, I've often tho't one should be able to make a lightweight weapon w a min of fuss/cost. 75TM gear ratios & 74 barrell would be a nice addition too.
200lbs should be realstic.
Its a very nice looking bike (apart from the gold rims) even w the YZ tank, which isn't too-far out of place IMHO.
Its not hard to see Mark's point w the works replica tag (& the original price!), but I don't have a problem w it, since it is used so broadly these days.
He does actually call it a "TM250 works replica", which is an oxymoron if ever there was one!!
So I don't really think he's trying to misrepresent it.