Author Topic: Claiming Rule  (Read 6366 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pokey

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1453
  • Arse .. Elbow. Know the difference
    • View Profile
    • FB
Claiming Rule
« on: July 22, 2014, 05:39:45 pm »
On a different place I just read about the AMA  Claiming rule where in the interest of an even playing fields a competitor could claim another riders bike  upon presenting a cheque for a set standard amount and the claim form.
Can you imagine picking up Marty Tripes RC250  for a song?

 Have we ever had that situation on Oz or even the rule?

 


you can read about it here

http://www.mxworksbike.com/index.php/history/mx-history/116-the-ama-claiming-rule-controversy

Offline JohnnyO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4658
  • Qld
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2014, 05:58:59 pm »
No that was a US only rule for a couple of years.

Offline tony27

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1907
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2014, 06:24:32 pm »
Which year did they bring in the production bike only rule in?
The rule seems to have some large loopholes with the top teams running factory forks that aren't available to anyone else

Offline Iain Cameron

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2014, 06:52:43 pm »
From my often shaky memory in 1976 Yamaha had a watercooled 125 OW27  that Hannah was riding there was a claim made but lost as Hannah made a counter claim and by luck only won  , Yamaha quickly got the bike out of the US and it was then raced in Europe for the rest of the season . Iain
« Last Edit: July 22, 2014, 06:56:23 pm by iainyz »
Yamaha tragic ; dt1, rt1, dt2, rt2, dt2mx , rt2mx , mx250, mx360,sc500, 74dt125, yzx125, yzc250, yzc400, yzd250, yzd400, yzh250, yzh80 , dt100 , xr75 ko xr80 03 , it175 82 . Not a member of any club

Offline Iain Cameron

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2014, 06:58:48 pm »
From 84 Yamaha was running stock bikes in the US  supercross  .
Yamaha tragic ; dt1, rt1, dt2, rt2, dt2mx , rt2mx , mx250, mx360,sc500, 74dt125, yzx125, yzc250, yzc400, yzd250, yzd400, yzh250, yzh80 , dt100 , xr75 ko xr80 03 , it175 82 . Not a member of any club

Offline Nathan S

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 7275
  • HEAVEN #818
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2014, 08:06:59 pm »
AMA Production rule was 1986.
The good thing about telling the truth is that you don't have to remember what you said.

Offline evo550

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2014, 09:01:52 pm »
Which year did they bring in the production bike only rule in?
The rule seems to have some large loopholes with the top teams running factory forks that aren't available to anyone else
The production rule only required use of production frame, swingarm and engine cases, IIRC.

Offline JohnnyO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4658
  • Qld
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2014, 09:02:24 pm »
From my often shaky memory in 1976 Yamaha had a watercooled 125 OW27  that Hannah was riding there was a claim made but lost as Hannah made a counter claim and by luck only won  , Yamaha quickly got the bike out of the US and it was then raced in Europe for the rest of the season . Iain
You are thinking of Marty Smiths type2 Honda, after a claiming attempt it was parked and Marty rode a fmf  modified CR125.
Hannah rode the water cooled OW all year..

Offline r4brightred

  • C-Grade
  • **
  • Posts: 85
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #8 on: July 22, 2014, 09:22:36 pm »
Hannah did not ride the water cooled bike all season. Yamaha got scared after the attempted claim on the YZ and switched to air cooled and then later switched back to water cooled again later in the season.

Offline DJRacing

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1598
  • YZ125X
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #9 on: July 22, 2014, 09:31:26 pm »
Yes, didnt the water cooled Hannah bike get ridden by Rond in Europe
« Last Edit: July 22, 2014, 09:50:54 pm by DJRacing »
If at first you dont succeed, give up and drink beer

Offline JohnnyO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4658
  • Qld
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #10 on: July 22, 2014, 09:53:03 pm »
Hannah did not ride the water cooled bike all season. Yamaha got scared after the attempted claim on the YZ and switched to air cooled and then later switched back to water cooled again later in the season.
Really? I was unaware of that only remember Honda taking Smiths new bike from him..

Ok just read in Hannahs book that Mickey Boone tried to claim Bob's bike in 76 so they went to the old aircooled engine for a couple of rounds at the same time Smith rode a modified production CR125 and Suzuki put LaPorte back on a RM125 instead of his factory RA125..
« Last Edit: July 22, 2014, 11:35:16 pm by JohnnyO »

Offline KTM47

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #11 on: July 22, 2014, 10:00:19 pm »
I vaguely remember someone did manage to claim a bike under the rule.  He was given hell by everyone else and did get much help after it.  I think they changed to rule after that.  Also the AMA Superbikes had a claiming rule on the forks.  Someone claimed Mat Mladin's forks.  I don't think the forks were much use when handed over.
MAICOS RULE DESPITE THE FOOLS

1999 KTM 200, 1976/77 KTM 400,1981 Maico 490

Offline JohnnyO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4658
  • Qld
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #12 on: July 22, 2014, 10:14:54 pm »
I vaguely remember someone did manage to claim a bike under the rule.  He was given hell by everyone else and did get much help after it.  I think they changed to rule after that.  Also the AMA Superbikes had a claiming rule on the forks.  Someone claimed Mat Mladin's forks.  I don't think the forks were much use when handed over.
That was John Roeder who claimed Marty Tripes 79 RC250

Offline g465b

  • B-Grade
  • ***
  • Posts: 250
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #13 on: July 22, 2014, 10:16:53 pm »
an interesting story followed the claiming rule-[/URL][URL=http://s1284.photobucket.com/user/gbankier/media/rc003_zps46465cb4.jpg.html][/URL]

Offline Tahitian_Red

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1109
  • Mugen ME480
    • View Profile
Re: Claiming Rule
« Reply #14 on: July 23, 2014, 01:09:02 am »
Lots of interesting stories about the claiming rule era.  I read that all the Japanese factories got together and agreed that every time some Privateer put in a claim they would all put in a claim for that bike and then give it back to the Factory that owned it, so every "Claimer" only had a 1 in 5 chance of winning.  Looks like Roeder got lucky! (I believe he had lost the week before.)
The "Factory Novice"
California, USA

'74 Suzuki TM100, '75 Bultaco 250 Pursang, '77 Honda XR75, '77 Suzuki RM125B, '77 Yamaha YZ400D, '79 Honda CR250RZ Moto-X Fox Replica, '83 Honda ME480RD Mugen