When the split was proposed it was recognised that Dirt Track probably wouldnt have the numbers to warrant the "split", so the option for a club to apply for a combined event was left open. When I proposed to MA that it would be fair to all concerned to reduce the fee it was envisaged the the the Classic promoter would pay $2000, Post Classic $2000, giving MA $4000 total.This was a win-win as the two clubs saved $1000 each and MA got an extra $1000.If a club was granted a combined all eras in one event as was to be expected for Dirt Track, it was assumed MA would treat and charge as one event. It was never expected there would be a "double dip"
However the final decision to run Classics only was the club's, primarily on the basis of insufficient time to include all classes in the two days. A three day event was not an option due to local noise restrictions.To blame MA , the organising club, or the "split" for any perceived short-coming in this event is misguided. Instead blame the increased popularity of our sport and introduction of later era classes .
I think the MA fee situation needs to be clarified, but I for one welcome the momentum our sport has developed. Look at the big picture..