Author Topic: Thumper Nats back on track how good would it be???????  (Read 5195 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mustanggrahame

  • A-Grade
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
    • View Profile
Re: Thumper Nats back on track how good would it be???????
« Reply #15 on: April 05, 2012, 09:52:08 pm »
Hi Slakewell, wasn't the early Thumper Nats support race was a twin shock class not Evo? Just trying to remember.
Cheers, Grahame
RT1, DT1F, MX100A, TY80A, YZ80D, DT125E, CR125RE, 1982 KTM125RV, 1985 Can Am ASE, 1989 YZ250WR, 1991 YZ250WR

Offline Nathan S

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 7275
  • HEAVEN #818
    • View Profile
Re: Thumper Nats back on track how good would it be???????
« Reply #16 on: April 05, 2012, 09:54:36 pm »
Sod a revival of the "Thumper Nats" - in 2012, we need "Dinger Nats".

The good thing about telling the truth is that you don't have to remember what you said.

Offline GMC

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3693
  • Broadford, Vic
    • View Profile
Re: Thumper Nats back on track how good would it be???????
« Reply #17 on: April 05, 2012, 10:06:54 pm »
Sod a revival of the "Thumper Nats" - in 2012, we need "Dinger Nats".



Yes but acording to many e-bay adds big old 2 strokes are thumpers ::)
Wisdom is wasted on the young
G.M.C.  Bringing the past into the future

Shock horror, its here at last...
www.geoffmorrisconcepts.com

For the latest in GMC news...
http://www.geoffmorrisconcepts.com/8/news/

Offline Slakewell

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3577
  • Slakewell Motordrome
    • View Profile
Re: Thumper Nats back on track how good would it be???????
« Reply #18 on: April 05, 2012, 10:21:12 pm »
Hi Slakewell, wasn't the early Thumper Nats support race was a twin shock class not Evo? Just trying to remember.
Cheers, Grahame

Mate It's been a few beers since then, But I think I based the class on the USA EVO rules which were nice and simple( back Then) Twin shock air cooled drummed brake. EVO at the time had no real championship or MA rules
Current bikes. KTM MC 250 77 Husky CR 360 77, Husky 82 420 Auto Bitsa XR 200 project. Dont need a pickle just need to ride my motorcickle

Offline JohnnyO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4658
  • Qld
    • View Profile
Re: Thumper Nats back on track how good would it be???????
« Reply #19 on: April 05, 2012, 10:29:23 pm »
Hi Slakewell, wasn't the early Thumper Nats support race was a twin shock class not Evo? Just trying to remember.
Cheers, Grahame
Correct.. It started life as the Twinshock class in '93 and became Evo for '96-'97 before being dropped.
I was at the first race at Inverell and did the whole series in Evo in '96/'97

Offline Slakewell

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3577
  • Slakewell Motordrome
    • View Profile
Re: Thumper Nats back on track how good would it be???????
« Reply #20 on: April 05, 2012, 10:42:40 pm »
I was told they dropped it because the big sponsors at the time didn't feel it fitted and the race program was getting full as a fat ladies sock
Current bikes. KTM MC 250 77 Husky CR 360 77, Husky 82 420 Auto Bitsa XR 200 project. Dont need a pickle just need to ride my motorcickle

Offline VMX247

  • Megastar
  • *******
  • Posts: 8766
  • Western Australia
    • View Profile
Re: Thumper Nats back on track how good would it be???????
« Reply #21 on: April 05, 2012, 10:50:22 pm »
Yes popularity killed it ~race team semi-trailers had to find a way onto the farmers paddocks.....too much of a good thing..
The original concept reads alot like todays Classic Dirt...Lithgow loam...old bikes....all cc's...grasstrack and loads of fun.... ;D...thanks Transmoto magazine
« Last Edit: April 05, 2012, 10:55:17 pm by VMX247 »
Best is in the West !!

number 87

  • Guest
Re: Thumper Nats back on track how good would it be???????
« Reply #22 on: April 06, 2012, 04:55:13 pm »
Have not read the entire thread but i a "ring ding nat" would fly better . . . . think about it, quite a reversal but mainstream mx has had the same reversal . . .

#87