Thanks sudman
Here's "a genuine factory racing frame used by Bultaco sponsored riders while racing in US"
It is typical pursang except for the boxed in pivot area, & as you'll see in the following pic, has a diff shaped rear loop - more squared & longer
Note the frame # stamped on it. That is a Bul/factory serial # - ie B100248
Caption reads: "All "factory racing" serial numbers on frames & engines usually started w 100"
And further: "Theres a bit of mystery with some of these factory racing frames as to their manufacture. Some might be custom fabrications in cro-mo, made somewhere in California during the 70s. (Bultaco sponsored pro-rider Tom Rapp had a custom cro-mo frame made in Ca for his Mod 68)"
Note also the seat mounts. They are a distinctive fabrication - classic made-in-the-factory-in-Spain workmanship. The sort of distinctive workmanship typical of a builder/fabricator that Geoff mentions above (post #82 "fabricators tend to have individual styles") is aparrent & you'll see it on just about every prod'n pursang of the era. They are decidedly diff to the ones on the CMS & Schwerma frames earlier in the thread if you check it out.
OK, so the boxed in pivot area is common to the CMS frame on bike #42U above, but which came 1st? Who copied who? CMS followed CZ practice in double plating the pivot area on the CZ frames so we have a precedent of them following the factory.
But is there any evidence this frame (B100248) appeared before the CMS pursang frames advertised in late 74? Yes. All JP's longtravel bikes I've seen had the top shock mount moved forward, so its likely to be from the 73 GP season. By the TransAMA of late 73 everybody had LTR susp'n.
Furthermore, the 400 prototype that J Mingels rode in 73 500GP season is stamped 100260 & a similar engine at Hughs Bultaco (for which there's evidence it was probably one used by Pomeroy) is 100262. That would seem to indicate this frame (100248) was used early in the 73 GP season, long before CMS used the boxed-in-pivot area on their late 74 frames.