Author Topic: What's wrong with this picture  (Read 3348 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Oggy Doggy

  • Guest
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2009, 05:14:32 pm »
Benolkins been wheeling and dealing on Ebay for years, always with the big hoo haa about how good he and his brothers are or were. That poor old Honda is so wrong on so many levels. The 480 engine puts it into some make believe class we haven't got here, the swingarm makes it look like a hill climber but should be great for his "third gear starts" which he mentions twice so it must be a big selling point. My worry is that after that huge third gear hole shot, how are you going to turn the bastard?
Those 20" shocks would be a bit creepy too. What do you reckon Walter? Overall, he seems to have drastically altered the bikes geometry just so it doesn't loop out on those third gear launches. Weird.

ps, I collect Webco stuff and wan't aware they made a head for the CR480. It looks like a stockie to me.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2009, 05:19:02 pm by Oggy Doggy »

Offline JohnnyO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4658
  • Qld
    • View Profile
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2009, 05:22:14 pm »
That swingarm is way too long & those shocks look to be off road car shocks. Doesn't look right and how would you turn it without a berm on every corner. His brother Tom is a gun rider but could he ride that thing?

Offline MX?

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 609
    • View Profile
    • Classic Bike Forum
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2009, 06:28:01 pm »
ps, I collect Webco stuff and wan't aware they made a head for the CR480. It looks like a stockie to me.

You'd know this guy then?

DR

  • Guest
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2009, 06:32:36 pm »
mmmm...'wrong on so many levels' is a pretty good description. Afraid I'm a non believer :-\ put the original gear back on and you'd have yourself a really nice bike. A good mate had the CR480 we rebuilt completely. In stock trim it rode really nice. After hoping off the big '78 RM rattletrap the CR felt sooooo plush and seemed worlds apart rather than just the 2 years. Swingarm cracks/woes ended the blokes patience and it got sold off super cheap..another silly mistake in hindsight ::)

Offline VMX Andrew

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 961
    • View Profile
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2009, 06:45:33 pm »
 they look really vintage dont they...them shocks...

Offline Hoony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4309
  • Melbourne, Vic.
    • View Profile
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2009, 06:49:56 pm »
it looks PUS
Long time Honda Fan, but all bike nut in general, Big Bore 2 stroke fan.    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJoKP6MawYI
1985 Honda CR500RF "Big Red"
1986 Honda CR250RG
2005 KTM 300EXC "The GruntMeister" ( I love that engine)

Offline Nathan S

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 7275
  • HEAVEN #818
    • View Profile
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2009, 07:08:55 pm »
Quote
Hand Crafted Swing Arm glass Blasted and Clearcoated it is just a little longer the a new crf 450  for more stability, also helps keepthe front end down for 3rd gear starts.

My first thought was that it must have a 12" rear wheel then...

Rough measurments (of pics on my monitor) suggest that he's got a swing arm that's around 24.5" long, with a 57" total wheelbase.
Similarly rough measurements (of pics on my monitor) suggest that a new 450F's swing arm is around 25" long, with a 59" total wheelbase (the 59" came from the spec sheet).

So yeah, while it looks as goofy as hell, it might actually work.

The good thing about telling the truth is that you don't have to remember what you said.

Hornet

  • Guest
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2009, 07:11:48 pm »
they look really vintage dont they...them shocks...


How much a pair ?

Offline LWC82PE

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 6006
    • View Profile
    • PE motorcycles & SuzukiTS.com
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2009, 07:14:57 pm »
according to the ebay listing $700 US pair
Wanted - 1978 TS185 frame or frame&motor. Frame # TS1852-24007 up to TS1852-39022

Oggy Doggy

  • Guest
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #10 on: March 30, 2009, 07:17:18 pm »
I think the shocks may be Fournales air shocks. They aren't that good apparently.

Offline VMX Andrew

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 961
    • View Profile
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #11 on: March 30, 2009, 07:21:53 pm »
yep...ive never seen any vintage fox shocks that look like that before....
they look more like the modern day fox shocks that the pro mountain bikes are wearing...

Offline LWC82PE

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 6006
    • View Profile
    • PE motorcycles & SuzukiTS.com
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #12 on: March 30, 2009, 07:22:41 pm »
Nah im sure they made by Fox. look at the sticker. As johnnyO suggested they are probably designed for an offroad buggy

http://www.foxracingshox.com/

see what i mean buy having no restrcitions on some modern shocks on vintage bikes, you can get away with these sort of shocks
« Last Edit: March 30, 2009, 07:28:04 pm by LWC3077 »
Wanted - 1978 TS185 frame or frame&motor. Frame # TS1852-24007 up to TS1852-39022

cultofthumpers

  • Guest
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #13 on: March 30, 2009, 07:28:19 pm »
The shocks are off a snowmobile. What a rip.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2009, 07:32:06 pm by cultofthumpers »

Offline JohnnyO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4658
  • Qld
    • View Profile
Re: What's wrong with this picture
« Reply #14 on: March 30, 2009, 07:46:10 pm »
That swingarm looks about 5" longer than a stock arm, a 1980 CR250 could do with a wheelbase about 1-2inches longer. It has a standard wheelbase of 57" and an '83 CR480 has a wheelbase of 58.5" and they handle fine. Yeah they are modern day Fox shocks.