Author Topic: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design  (Read 19804 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Freakshow

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 7277
  • Adelaide, SA - looking for a "YZA" tank
    • View Profile
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #45 on: September 18, 2008, 09:26:49 am »
Sometimes your ignorance astounds me Freaky.  :o
meH Why ?

if they only need to meet this db thats the only thing required.   i dont understand what all the fuss is about with all the pipe crap.    WHo give a shit about it being under or over ? im not sure why you ladies are still to coin a phrase "dragging it out "  Both where available so who care you cant exclude abike just because some 70's brouchure your mum has shows it with one style of pipe, thats ignorance a it highers level.

Pipes a pipe, low boy, high boy. mummies boy who cares this is getting stale.

Can someone DEFine low- boy ?  cause if your just generalising on a under pipe thats horse shit right there.  Why would you say thats in anppropriate or are you just reffering to some kinda specific version ?
« Last Edit: September 18, 2008, 09:36:00 am by Freakshow »
74 Yamaha YZ's - 75 Yamaha YZ's
74 Yamaha  flattracker's
70  Jawa 2 valve speedway's

For sale -  PRE 75 Yamaha MX stuff, frame, motors and parts also some YAM DT1,2,A and Suzi TS bikes and stuff

firko

  • Guest
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #46 on: September 18, 2008, 10:35:42 am »
Quote
i dont understand what all the fuss is about with all the pipe crap.
Freaky, once again you go off on a rant, knowing forkall about what you are discussing. If you had followed the thread on this and the BigKs Husky topic you would know that the MoMs definition of what is allowable is totally inadequate. The fuss is to create intelligent debate and offer up alternative wording or interpretation to prevent some future pedantic troublemaker from protesting a legitimate bike out of a rightful win.

Quote
if they only need to meet this db thats the only thing required
This shows your ignorance of the subject. Being a newbie, sometimes it's better to shut up and learn from people who 1:have been around a bit longer than you, 2: Know what they are talking about, 3:can put up an intelligent, well structured argument and offer an alternative view and 4:Can put a post together with few if any spelling, grammar and syntax errors, something beyond your reach.  ;)

mx250

  • Guest
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #47 on: September 18, 2008, 10:49:30 am »
There goes the neighbourhood ::),

;D ;D

I'm not taking sides, I'm not taking sides, I'm not taking sides ;)

husky61

  • Guest
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #48 on: September 18, 2008, 11:15:36 am »
Tengan cuidado

Hay un oso en el bosque y el chico que está fastidiado

Offline matcho mick

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2279
    • View Profile
    • Moto Tumbi
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #49 on: September 18, 2008, 11:37:38 am »
keh? ;D
work,the curse of the racing class!!
if a hammer dosn't fix it,you have a electrical problem!!

firko

  • Guest
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #50 on: September 18, 2008, 11:42:03 am »
Sí Shoey. ;D
Este tonto de freakshow se pone me enoja.
Penso con mucha ilusión en el Vinduro! Salute....Marco Grande
« Last Edit: September 18, 2008, 12:28:00 pm by firko »

Offline vandy010

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1982
  • #789 MX125a BMCC Brisbane
    • View Profile
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #51 on: September 18, 2008, 12:07:01 pm »
and again in french!

pizza pasta le perfum'e eh carbona'ra iffel tower !
Bonjour!
"flat bickie"

RIBBO

  • Guest
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #52 on: September 18, 2008, 12:38:11 pm »
So Firko is the Spanish some left over from the Lobito

husky61

  • Guest
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #53 on: September 18, 2008, 12:58:06 pm »
Sí Marko

Entiendo la frustración.

Haré todo lo posible en la Vinduro como mi rodilla se siente mucho mejor.


Salute

Shoey

firko

  • Guest
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #54 on: September 18, 2008, 01:09:12 pm »
Shoey..... Me alegro la rodilla está bien. Vendré y echaré un vistazo otra vez pero busco mediados de los años 80 ATK durante el próximo año.
Estoy cansado de esto dickhead y su ortografía pobre, gramática mala e inhabilidad de entender el sentido común.

¡Ribbo, esto no es un terminado izquierdo del Lobito, esto es demasiado alimento mejicano cuándo yo era joven!

mx250

  • Guest
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #55 on: September 18, 2008, 01:23:21 pm »
Spanish, French ??? ::)

husky61

  • Guest
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #56 on: September 18, 2008, 01:23:56 pm »
Marco

Esperamos verlo a usted allí.

Shoey

husky61

  • Guest
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #57 on: September 18, 2008, 01:25:38 pm »
MX-250

 Si , Spanish amigo

Shoey

firko

  • Guest
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #58 on: September 18, 2008, 01:27:51 pm »
No hay problema Sr Shoey........Senor Graeme, Espanol ;)

Offline Freakshow

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 7277
  • Adelaide, SA - looking for a "YZA" tank
    • View Profile
Re: concerning pipes that do not basically follow the original design
« Reply #59 on: September 18, 2008, 01:42:41 pm »
Quote
i dont understand what all the fuss is about with all the pipe crap.
Freaky, once again you go off on a rant, knowing forkall about what you are discussing. If you had followed the thread on this and the BigKs Husky topic you would know that the MoMs definition of what is allowable is totally inadequate. The fuss is to create intelligent debate and offer up alternative wording or interpretation to prevent some future pedantic troublemaker from protesting a legitimate bike out of a rightful win.

Quote
if they only need to meet this db thats the only thing required
This shows your ignorance of the subject.   ;)

Whatever Dude....... i followed the "debate" from the first line so i understand whats going on here, learn to do your research you posted about 6th in this thread and i was 7th,  and if you bothered to read it back then you would see as much as it pains me to say it agreed with yours and the prevoius 6 opinions posted.   Maybe you dont get what the other Half the forum members think or even care cause its not what you want to hear ( all bow to me),  im just offering up an opinion and probally that of others which is what the "debate' asked for, but for some reason you always feel the need to muscle in and be some kind of control freak, thriving on putting others down, yet again, if they dont subscirbe to the world according you.   Your Newbie remark is offensive and goes to show your ignorance and immaturity  >:(

What if i reword my point for your old brain so it can come up to speed ?   My point was to say stop pissing about with rules, modifying rules, highlighting them etc etc, Just delete it.  stop wasting your time trying to reword a dead item.  if it pre 75 its all fair on pipes get it changed to that, if your the guru rule maker.  

Unfortunately this forum Albiet set up for MX, seems to slant rules in that genre, unfortunatley what many fail to remember is its knock on effect in Dt as well cause they are stacked in the moms together, unfortunatley lumped under the same rule every time you  piss about with it in mx, it can be detrimental to other disciplines.    And you know in 2 years time ,some one in MA will delete a section to save paper and the whole context changes again ( which has happened ) and then it starts all over again.

Forget the lines - up and over/ under debate.    The debate should only be ensure the rule states one basic  thing, 'any pre 75 exhaust can be any thing and any lines you dam well please so long as it was available prior to 75 or what ever you cut off is'.      

IF i want to put a low down on my MXA as a Dtracker i shouldnt have to worry about some dumb arse rule that now may be altered again and again to "must follow originals lines" or versions of the same,  other wise whats next we ban your mates purple bling bike cause it wasnt sold in that colour originally ?  And as you have freely admitted your self your bikes have been far from correct and illegal at many times, so why wouldnt you be voiceing to delete the pipe rule in its entirity to ensure open competition for all and showcase the evolution of the sport to encompase all that the era had to offer, not just the bits some visually like as a personal preferance, its not a museum or a brouchure competition.

Dont Waste your time trying to rewrite it cause the next version will be just as retarded, the rule is old, just delete the thing.   The more you stir it up chances it again being reworded wrong and highlighting it just made it a point for the next titles for someone to protest.  

Y para usted sen~or Firko porque no tienes los huevos para dirigir tus cojudeces directamente a mi en Ingles envez de ser un maricon y escribir sin cara.  Pd yo usere mi gramatica en la forma que me de la puta gana.   :-*
« Last Edit: September 18, 2008, 03:36:23 pm by Freakshow »
74 Yamaha YZ's - 75 Yamaha YZ's
74 Yamaha  flattracker's
70  Jawa 2 valve speedway's

For sale -  PRE 75 Yamaha MX stuff, frame, motors and parts also some YAM DT1,2,A and Suzi TS bikes and stuff