Yeah Ted as an aside, I don't understand the S1 Maico status at all. Which is another reason why I'm trying to understand the simple stuff. :-)
Anyway, my confused understanding of carbs.....
The rules essentially say when it comes to evo, 'components falling within the post classic era are acceptable'. Post classic is pre95 isn't it? It also has a specific rule for carbs saying 'period flat slide carbs' are acceptable, which I then interpret (uh-oh!) as pre95 carbs are ok. PWKs are late 80s aren't they?
So I wonder if the attempt to clarify the intent with carbs by adding an additional, specific rule actually confuses the situation. Most folks would simply refer to a pwk generically as a flat slide carb wouldn't they? Not a discussion I want to have at scrutineering! :-)
As for TLS brakes.... please ignore the brands I reference, its just for the sake of discussion of the rules.
I've seen new billet hubs and backing plates for Maicos. The backing plates seem accepted (legal) on the grounds of safety and I'm guessing the same goes for billet hubs. Makes sense to me.
I've also seen the same thing for husqvarnas and I imagine they are legal for the same reason as the maicos. Around 1984 tho husky's had a TLS front brake and you can buy a new replacement billet TLS brake for a husky.
So... it would seem that I could put an original husky TLS brake on a maico - its all period correct - and it would be legal. But if a new replacement billet TLS is legal on a husky then surely its still legal if you stick it on a maico, being A) the same situation as if you put oem husky parts on a maico and B) its legal on a husky.
Where it turns to complete mud to me is if a billet TLS brake made as a specific replacement part for a SLS maico is not legal, then maybe fitting a husky billet TLS brake to a maico is legal. Haarr! Bonkers!! I definitely ain't having that discussion at scrutineering.
So there is my personal struggle with some of the simple stuff. Thanks for being the only one brave/stoopid enuff to chew the fat Ted. :-)