Not sure how that is allowed? There is no 125 C2 anyway. I could understand a steel RM250C arm being allowed because it was also used on the 77 PE250, but there are several arms listed for PE-B RM-C but it seems to be just a chain tensioner mount difference and its a bit of a grey area as as to when the updated one came along and was shipped on PE250B's. Some could possibly argue that even the 250C arm might not be passable. I don't know how you could prove when the initial PE250B swinarm was superceeded by the RM250C swingarm with the spring loaded tensioner. Sometimes i think its too hard to prove or disprove these sorts of things these days. No one knows, no one remembers exactly, but the alloy C/C2 arms are an obvious no for pre 78, to me anyway.
What issue of VMX is that in? The latest one i have has got the SP511 on the front.
This one could probably be allowed if you could prove when the PE250B was being shipped with this eg before dec 31 1977
Part # = 61100-41850-019
Part Description = SWING ARM ASSEMBLY,REAR
Model Count = 3
PE250B 1977 246 PE250 DUAL PURPOSE
PE250C 1978 246 PE250 DUAL PURPOSE
RM250C 1978 246 RM250 OFF ROAD
This one probably should not be allowed
Part # = 61100-41880-019
Part Description = SWING ARM ASSEMBLY,REAR
Model Count = 1
RM250C 1978 246 RM250 OFF ROAD
This one also probably should not be allowed
Part # = 61100-41881-019
Part Description = SWING ARM ASSEMBLY,REAR
Model Count = 1
RM250C 1978 246 RM250 OFF ROAD
There should be no issues using this one
Part # = 61100-41841-019
Part Description = SWING ARM ASSEMBLY,REAR
Model Count = 3
PE250B 1977 246 PE250 DUAL PURPOSE
RM250B 1977 246 RM250 OFF ROAD
RM370B 1977 372 RM370 OFF ROAD