I am loading now on purpose, then I will continue editing to finish.
That way if this laptop just shuts off like sometimes it has
Progress will saved and it will save me from becoming really unhappy.
Ok, measured both sides of course, to be sure.
A = 19
B = Isn't that simple, it is 19.5 from center of hole to directly below it, but the plate needs to go down deeper at the front and rear so those points can be bent in to meet the arm tube
Alignment is the inside of outer plate with outer edge of axle slot.
20.5 is the inner gap between plates(Shocker eye bush width = 20, identical to the inside width of the top frame mount) Confirmed. So I imagine that they did it at 20.5 to provide for a paint allowance.
When I need to raise plans from pictures, I adjust screen size so to select the correct drafting scale rule by matching one to a known dimension. Check arm, pics and calculate. I am in no doubt you would have constructed many a good outcome from pics. Let me know if you want more.
C = 50.5 and the overall length of that inner LH plate is 86 on mine, not 83. That inner plate becomes a little shorter on the RH side after being intentionally deformed by a depth of 2.8 to move the shocker out to clear the chain and sprocket fastenning bolt heads.
Also Note; the thin HT nut brazed to the inside of the RH inner plate.
D = 9.5
Z = 10.5 (probably 11 without paint) and a bar for a press tool, with a radius of 20 (diameter 40), with the center of the depression being 74.5 from the very end of the arm.
So the bottom edge of the outside RH plate has to get bent in even more than the LH one, to be able to meet its weld. Indeed it is way more deformed than the one on the left side.
I can hardly believe how slow Picture Pale becomes when the Americans wake up and choke its portal to capacity.
That's your quota for the year too Geoffro
Nah, just kidding,
Anyhow
Good night Irene