Ok went testing ....
I didn't find any further improvement over my previous pilot jet extension, maybe a touch worse? With the airbox rubber mounted, it appeared to cause the carb to vibrate around a bit more? I tried pulling the carb body hard against the tension of the rubber joints with a big cable-tie to the frame, it seemed to reduce the vibration going through the carb but didn't reduce the high rpm/low throttle lean ping. I ended up putting the tin fuel bowl baffle plates back in and kept the higher float-level.
In an effort to establish other area's that could be causing the leanness; I did notice plenty of smoke coming from the pipe join to the barrel, while this is not an odd thing as many bikes leak at the header joint, I have to wonder if a big bore is more likely to take-in some fresh air with a negative pulse travelling past the leak? I'll put an 'o' ring in for the next test.
My next area of concern is with the carburetor 'pilot air bleed', from my understanding & experience on how the air-bleeds work in a carb, the effects of bleeding air into a fuel circuit (pilot or main circuit), the higher the rpm, the more air is bled into the circuit.
So, with the pilot jet down from the stock 68 to a 50, the bike still started cold without need for the choke, so the pilot jet is still too big, or there could be some other reason for the super-low rpm (kickstart speed) richness?
As the rpm's increase, while still with a slight throttle opening (still on the pilot circuit) the affects of the pilot air-bleed (air-screw) is leaning-out the mixture too much? The mixture screw was set at the stock 1.5 turns. So I figure for the next test I'll try going down to a 40 or 45 pilot jet with the air-screw turned right in, maybe around 1/4 turn? I wouldn't be surprised if I have to go even smaller with the pilot jet, maybe a 30 or 35 and seat the air-screw all the way home? But we'll see.
I have found in the past that the 'pilot air bleed' can have an affect mixtures during larger throttle openings, found by accident one time with an RM125B, that with the air-screw seated closed I got a high rpm/full throttle rich miss-fire, so with that in mind, if I end up seating the CR's air-screw home I may have to compensate further up the rpm/throttle opening settings?
I am surprised that an engine that is close to stock would require such a drastic change from the stock fuel curve? I did find many years ago when racing a Honda VTR1000 Firestorm, that once I opened up the airbox, I had to go from the stock 175 main jets to 300 (1.75mm to 3.00mm), this gave perfect power at 10,000 rpm but a very bad rich stumble at 6,000 rpm (at WOT), so I went back to the 175 mains but completely blocked-off the main air-bleeds ... perfect all the way through the rev range.
Stay tuned, will test again next week when the new jets arrive.