Author Topic: Are shock linkages a load of shit?  (Read 5195 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Boyracer

  • C-Grade
  • **
  • Posts: 130
    • View Profile
Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« on: December 01, 2014, 05:34:48 pm »
Just wondering does anybody else think single shock linkages are over kill?
Do we really need all that so the shock can change angle on compression?

Offline shelpi

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2056
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2014, 05:43:32 pm »
it also about progressiveness (is that a word) ;)

Offline mick25

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1162
  • Hunter valley NSW
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2014, 06:16:22 pm »
Some of the ktms didn't worry about them .
It might be just some extra parts to buy and replace to keep the spare part department going  ??? $

Offline Nathan S

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 7275
  • HEAVEN #818
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2014, 06:58:41 pm »
Jury is still out on the value of linkages vs PDS on properly setup rear ends for mortal riders, but manufacturers prefer linkages for two main reasons:
One setup suits a wider range of rider weights;
The market has demanded them (just like the market has demanded USD forks, twin chamber forks, EFI on 4Ts, etc, which are all actually negatives for the majority of riders).
The good thing about telling the truth is that you don't have to remember what you said.

Offline FourstrokeForever

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • AKA Mark H #35 VCM
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2014, 07:40:55 pm »
Jury is still out on the value of linkages vs PDS on properly setup rear ends for mortal riders, but manufacturers prefer linkages for two main reasons:
One setup suits a wider range of rider weights;
The market has demanded them (just like the market has demanded USD forks, twin chamber forks, EFI on 4Ts, etc, which are all actually negatives for the majority of riders).

It is proven that a linkage system is more forgiving.....just like a chromoly frame is more forgiving that a twin spar aluminium job.

Modern MX and Enduro bikes are built for racing and for racers. The average Joe will just have to adapt to the machine. Or, as in most cases, spend another gorilla or so at the suspension shop then another couple hunge more at the tuners to get a decent, rideable and comfortable trail bike.
Arrogance.....A way of life for the those that having nothing further to learn.

Offline N22

  • C-Grade
  • **
  • Posts: 102
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2014, 10:58:55 pm »
Well probably-But.

 The forks on the front of the bike work OK,and they don't have linkages.Back in the days when longer travel was all the go,some riders tried putting forks on the rear,in place of shock,to get more oil capacity and less fade.It sort of worked,but they got in the way,and were a bit heavy.However it really has to do with mechanical advantage,and moving weight forward( mass centralisation)to achieve a better controlled suspension.KTM persevered with PDS,but eventually went back to linkage.

 It's a bit like only having 1gear,like a Speedway Bike,which works well at full speed,but is a bit tricky when you get to a hairpin!
If you are not living on the Edge,you are taking up to much Space!!

BSA Gold Flash,Triumph Bonnevile,DT250A,YZ250B,PE250a.YZ125D,RM125C,RM125N,RM125X,IT175H,IT250G,03CRF250X,07CRF450X,O8CRF250

Offline Lozza

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4206
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2014, 07:00:24 am »
linkage slows down piston speed which gives better damping control
Jesus only loves two strokes

Offline FourstrokeForever

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • AKA Mark H #35 VCM
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2014, 08:58:14 am »
linkage slows down piston speed which gives better damping control

Exactly. There are some great tricks for making a PDS more compliant, but it does involve expertise and a fair chunk of change.
Arrogance.....A way of life for the those that having nothing further to learn.

Offline Davey Crocket

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4408
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #8 on: December 02, 2014, 09:24:25 am »
PDS is actually an Ohlins design, WP just bought it off them.
QVMX.....Australia's #1 VMX club......leading the way.

Offline KTM47

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #9 on: December 02, 2014, 09:50:10 am »
Ryan Dungey and Roger De Coster think linkage suspension is needed to win, but the average rider probably doesn't need  extra maintainence.
MAICOS RULE DESPITE THE FOOLS

1999 KTM 200, 1976/77 KTM 400,1981 Maico 490

Offline Rusty

  • C-Grade
  • **
  • Posts: 138
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #10 on: December 02, 2014, 11:52:01 am »
I would say until maybe the early 90's most linkage systems were not as efficient as a good twin shock setup.  All the talk about rising/falling rates was total crap and a good set of reservoir shocks worked better and lasted way longer into a 45 minute moto.   The linkage system did however have one major advantage - it allowed the bike to be a lot slimmer which aided the rider moving around the bike.
Poke that bone back in and wrap it up tight sport - I am racing the second moto.

Offline Rusty

  • C-Grade
  • **
  • Posts: 138
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #11 on: December 02, 2014, 01:23:16 pm »
Hours testing a certain yellow brand as a kid & talking to some very smart Japanese engineers taught me the WASP......  I think one described linkages and the reasoning for as .... A road of Sheet  ;D
Poke that bone back in and wrap it up tight sport - I am racing the second moto.

Offline OverTheHill

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #12 on: December 03, 2014, 08:48:00 am »
talking linkages, back in about "87 [i had an "86 kx125] & a work mate had an RM250.  The back end went super soft during a race meet [i mean under damped & undersprung--couldn't ride it] I thought i knew everything & knew bloody nothing & decided it had lost the gas plus the damper piston had spat the piston ring off---was that bad---but in the end i heard that the rising rate rocker underneath had locked up in the big diameter needle bearing thingy [lack of lube obviously] & was all ok now. So learnt something there for sure. Funny thing is [not funny] same guy went on to be Rossi's main man [suspension i think lol] for the last 20 odd years & still is. Think he headed off with Simon Crafar from here originaly then onto Rossi, good guy too. Anyway, off track as usual sorry but just reminiscing over what linkages 'do'. Cheers.
 ps, Oh, then my KX ripped the linkage lugs off the frame landing from a jump & my backs been stuffed since.

Offline Ted

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2800
    • View Profile
Re: Are shock linkages a load of shit?
« Reply #13 on: December 03, 2014, 10:39:40 am »
PDS is actually an Ohlins design, WP just bought it off them.

Correct
81 YZ 465 H   77 RM 125 B