Thanks to those of you who posted your protest letters on this thread.
I was a little unsure of my wording and they helped as a draft.
I've just sent this to Ross at [email protected] and I encourage everyone else to send your letters ASAP.
96db is unfair but right now it's the Law.
I've posted mine here in the hope it helps someone else draft a letter.It's a tad wordy - but I had something to say.Ross,
I’m writing to you as I understand you’re part of the group who can make a difference with regard to the current noise emission debate.
The purpose of my letter is to say I’m disappointed, and more than a little alarmed, at the current noise emission levels expected of the Vintage Motocross machines.
As you’re no doubt aware, these machines were built decades ago as
pure race bikes.
Noise was not a consideration; and these machines are not designed to be muffled beyond a reasonable range.
The current expectation of 96 db seems highly unfair considering the Historic Road Racing machines are allowed a more achievable 102 db limit.
Both disciplines use machines from the same factories of the same era; and the same Marques fill the starting grids on respective race days.
As an exercise, I asked a young child to point out the difference in a photo of a Classic Road Race Bike and a Vintage Motocross Bike:
I smiled when he said, “One has lumpy tyres and one has smooth tyres...”; he’s not far wrong is he?
Let’s face it, given the similarities between the disciplines there can be no justification to single out the VMX bikes for a lower and quite unreasonable emission level.
Our Country and others are responding to ‘green’ concerns and this debate can easily be linked to this mind set.
The VMX community is no different in that regard; we’re not digging our heels in and refusing to budge.
What we are asking for is an achievable decibel level; parity with our Road Racing aficionados on “smooth tyres” at 102 db.
The VMX community as a whole is concerned over this issue and rightly so.
Our passion for the sport and the huge commitment in time and money is no less than that of the Historic Road Racers.
Given your position in the sport we ask you consider this request and put forward our group concerns to those who can alter this unfair limit.
Thanks for your time; I’d appreciate a response to my letter.
Regards,
Graham Newton