Author Topic: F11 250  (Read 3347 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sorelegs11

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
    • View Profile
F11 250
« on: August 01, 2014, 05:14:28 pm »
I have found one of these that needs some tlc.
Are these things any good?
If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards.

Offline topari

  • B-Grade
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
    • View Profile
Re: F11 250
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2014, 06:44:55 pm »
Is good. Where did you find it ?
topari

1979 IT400F, 1984 kdx200

Offline Sorelegs11

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
    • View Profile
Re: F11 250
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2014, 08:07:13 am »
In a little old ladies shed  ;)
If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards.

Offline Doc

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 755
    • View Profile
    • FB
Re: F11 250
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2014, 09:36:12 am »
F11's were, for the majority, overlooked back in the day. Quite possibly the pick of all the Japanese 250cc trailies pre 1975. Have taken part in some really good rides on mine ;)


Offline sleepy

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 805
    • View Profile
Re: F11 250
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2014, 09:36:42 am »
They are a very solid motor. It's not called Kawaski heavy industries for nothing.

Offline 80-85 husky

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3847
    • View Profile
Re: F11 250
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2014, 09:52:07 am »
they could have questionable gbox issues...at times in particular ..early kx's

Offline 211

  • A-Grade
  • ****
  • Posts: 340
    • View Profile
Re: F11 250
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2014, 06:47:01 pm »
yep, the 450 has a crap gearbox but Doc is right the F11 is a really good thing.
No issues with the gear boxes on the other early KXs just sticky clutch plates that can be a pain in the butt.
these should be listed as a follow on for pre 75

albrid-3

  • Guest
Re: F11 250
« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2014, 08:02:46 am »
They where also raced back in 1973, I have photo`s and film to prove that.
There is the first F11 Scrambler
« Last Edit: August 04, 2014, 08:04:24 am by Dave #14 »

Offline Sorelegs11

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
    • View Profile
Re: F11 250
« Reply #8 on: August 04, 2014, 08:27:42 am »
Thanks for the feedback men I might try and aquire it now.
If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards.

Offline jerry

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
  • Beware the work ethic of the evil
    • View Profile
Re: F11 250
« Reply #9 on: August 04, 2014, 10:55:26 am »
Ole Peterson rode that Dave. Looks very much like an RH Suzuki. I believe the first version had a red tank. J

Offline 211

  • A-Grade
  • ****
  • Posts: 340
    • View Profile
Re: F11 250
« Reply #10 on: August 04, 2014, 04:58:51 pm »
Ole Peterson rode that Dave. Looks very much like an RH Suzuki. I believe the first version had a red tank. J

Agree!! F11 in MX trim is a quick bike
there is a reason why I have an RH250 and a shed full of tin tank KXs. Was always his biggest fan and agree that if you look at the KXs after 74 there is a certain connection that can be made - even the rear end of the 75 6 250/400 looks like the 74 1/2 RH/RN rear end. He was the great development rider of that generation.
I even have a klx400r which still gives me a chuckle.