Nathan I know "someone " who works for the other large Australian steel manufacturer (name starts with the letter "O") and the money the guys make in the mills is over AUD$100K pa.
Back in the late 90s, I knew a bloke who worked for BHP Steel as an operator. He was on ~$75k/year
then. Presumably, if the job still exists, it's paying at least $100k now...
The more I think about it, the more I think that the real issue is wages vs housing affordability (including rent) - and that anyone who focuses only on "excessive" wages needs to be treated with great suspicion.
Personally, we live very simply, with a keen on our bang-for-buck (our newest car is 13 years old, most of our clothing comes from the op shop, 90% of our groceries come from Aldi, etc. We are forever despairing at the way various friends spend money on luxuries while complaining about how tough they're doing it...).
With a smaller than average mortgage, and two incomes (both around the national average), we get by just fine.
But if we were to try to feed four mouths on either one of our incomes, we would be financially paralysed - the bills could be paid, but there wouldn't be much money left ovr for the fun stuff... If interest rates returned to their Howard-era average, then there would be
no money left over for the fun stuff.
http://economics.hia.com.au/media/House%20price%20to%20income%20ratio%20-%20FINAL.pdfNoting the conclusions in this, housing was less affordable under Howard's "record low" interest rates than it was under Keating's sky high interest rates...
Perhaps we do need a recession to burst the housing bubble... It's very hard to be excited about the misery a recession causes, but property prices are continuing to climb... They had levelled off for a couple of years there (2010ish), which meant they were dropping in relative terms. This would have been the ideal outcome (a "soft landing"), but it needed to run for a decade or so to make a real difference. Instead, it looks as though we are headed for a crash landing.