#1
Observations of a Cyber Racer
Cyber Racers are people too (as opposed to Cyberdyne Racers)
Who entered the 2013 Post Classic titles and who didn’t is irrelevant, looking for someone to blame is a pointless exercise, it will only help to see the whole scene implode further.
Those that didn’t enter don’t need to justify themselves, we only need to know the reasons why they didn’t enter so we can move forward with better ideas.
Looking to blame the forum because its 2000 odd members didn’t want to race is also a pointless exercise.
I still believe the forum is a good place to bounce ideas from, what you do with those ideas though comes back to you.
If a forum member recommends you jump off a cliff and you find yourself waking up at the bottom of a cliff with multiple internal injuries then the problem is how you interpreted and acted on the recommendation, not the recommendation itself.
When someone recommends a brand of spoke kit that fitted up fine and look good then I like to look deeper as to whether or not the spokes have ever been used on a track and for how long.
I’ve seen guys say they like to see bikes raced with original shocks but I note that these guys usually don’t ride.
So you thought the Post Classic Title thread was a big one and because it was a popular thread there would be lots of entries.
Well I went through the thread the other night looking for statistics.
By page 17 in April when it was announced that not many had entered there was only responses from 51 individuals and straight away I can pick 8 of those that never intended to enter, they were just offering input.
This isn’t a swipe at anyone as I am one of the 8
Another 2 have since said they never intended to enter as they were going to work the event.
It’s not like there were hundreds saying they were going to ride this event.
Just because someone makes 10 comments doesn't mean 10 people are going to show up.
The forum is a good place to get exposure and gauge opinions but you must analyze what you read