Author Topic: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks  (Read 6503 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SON

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
    • View Profile
DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« on: December 07, 2012, 10:23:51 pm »
I am about to get 4 cranks rebuilt 2 with standard length long rods
2 with shorter rods
Is there any demand for any more?
Price will be about AUD$425 including new rod kit

Offline ola_martin

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2012, 11:46:06 pm »
What stroke?

Offline SON

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2012, 04:32:31 am »
What would you like?

Offline SON

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2012, 07:47:52 am »
I am thinking of doing two different lengths
A little R&D
1 for MX
1 for Flattrack

oldfart

  • Guest
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2012, 12:18:59 pm »
Interested in Mx version...  cams are problem they tend to wear out the carrier.

Offline evo550

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2012, 05:41:13 pm »
I am about to get 4 cranks rebuilt 2 with standard length long rods
2 with shorter rods
Is there any demand for any more?
Price will be about AUD$425 including new rod kit
What does changing rod length do on a fourstroke??

Offline SON

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2012, 06:50:19 pm »
Long rod is better for several reasons
However that will require a barrell base spacer, a longer cam chain and a bit of work to get the compression and valve clearances just right.
The squashed or shorter rod Might??? Alleviate the barrell spacer, allow the standard cam chain and is generally easier to set up, big downside steeper angles don't like revs but should be OK for VMX.
My TT 605 runs the Powroll short rod stroker but is for MX
I would not run a short rod stroker on Flattrack.

Offline ola_martin

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2012, 08:26:28 pm »
Sorry, been without a computer for some days.
I don't know much about these engines, just that I had one as a kid, and would love to build something cool for MX with a DR engine. I don't even have one anymore...
I don't have the knowledge to calculate the compromise between stroke and rod angle, but it would of course be best to have as much cc as possible.
If I where to buy a crank I would like the short rod type, as this engine is tall enough...

Offline SON

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2012, 09:15:26 pm »
Better question/answer is MX bottom end mild revs V Flattrack top end high revs
Answer your own question but shorter works for me

Offline ola_martin

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #9 on: December 11, 2012, 10:52:54 pm »
SON, what stroke do you reccomend as max with a shortened rod then? For MX.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2012, 12:48:46 am by ola_martin »

Offline evo550

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #10 on: December 12, 2012, 12:32:20 am »
Long rod is better for several reasons
However that will require a barrell base spacer, a longer cam chain and a bit of work to get the compression and valve clearances just right.
The squashed or shorter rod Might??? Alleviate the barrell spacer, allow the standard cam chain and is generally easier to set up, big downside steeper angles don't like revs but should be OK for VMX.
My TT 605 runs the Powroll short rod stroker but is for MX
I would not run a short rod stroker on Flattrack.
When you say shorter rod, do you mean standard length rod ?

Offline ola_martin

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #11 on: December 12, 2012, 12:48:25 am »
When you stroke a crank you off course need to shorten the rod by half of the total increased stroke, to keep the piston stopping at the same height. This comes at the expense of a less ideal rod angle.

When you stroke the crank and keep the original rod you need a spacer of half of the increased stoke at the bottom of the cylinder.


Offline pancho

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2375
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #12 on: December 12, 2012, 11:04:35 am »
 Somewhere in the "files" there is considerable discussion on con rod length and the associated variation in rod angulation (is that a word?)
I found it very interesting in light of my experience in the '60s were short rods were the "in thing".
 The summary in my head indicates that shorter rod equals more torque at some limited rev range, all the current experts seem to agree that longer rod is better overall.
  (still talking engine!) ;)
pancho
dont follow me i'm probably off line!

Offline David Lahey

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 956
  • Gladstone, Queensland Australia
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #13 on: December 12, 2012, 01:53:05 pm »
Longer rod = heavier rod so there is a significant trade-off
previous pseudonym feetupfun

Offline SON

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
    • View Profile
Re: DR400/SP Stroker Cranks
« Reply #14 on: December 12, 2012, 02:02:41 pm »
Long rod is fine for flattrack where you want the flywheel weight,
I have photos of the DR engine with the Yamaha rod, I just don't know how to post them,