Universities SHOULD BE teach vocational training. After all, isn’t the idea of a Uni degree to get a job?
Well no. That's where the Australian University system differs from your idea of what a University is for.
TAFE is about practical training. There is a hint there in the name - Technical and further Education. CAE's were a half-way house. A University is NOT and should not be about training boiler-makers or tin-smiths or world-class welders. A degree holding engineer is a beginner, but he
is an engineer, not a labourer or tradesman. He can now grow and develop over his career, because he has the theoretical underpinnings that NO tradesmen will ever have the
time to attain. If you are asking an engineer to be a skilled tradesman, then there is or will quickly be, a disconnect! Someone mentioned a Chief Engineer straight out of Uni. That is a management failure of epic proportions and should never be filled with a graduate. Don't blame the engineer or the tradesmen on the floor. That issue lies squarely with some moron in an executive position.
Should we have every damned job require a 'degree' -
of course not! The stupidity of that comes up endlessly. I know of fairly straightforward roles that any of us could do, with a bit of in-house training, that absolutely do NOT require the deep fundamentals, yet those same roles are advertised as requiring a Masters Degree, FFS!
This is where the system today is an utter shambles. WAY too many positions are advertised asking for a degree. Utterly irrelevant to the role... A highly skilled tradesman is often what they want, yet the demand is for a degree holder. Screwing up - not the tradesman, not the degree holding Engineer - the bloody management!
Luke