Author Topic: rickman monty  (Read 2228 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


All Things 414

  • Guest
Re: rickman monty
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2010, 08:12:54 am »
Now that is ugly. :-[

firko

  • Guest
Re: rickman monty
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2010, 09:19:20 am »
Yep, it's the ugliest bike that Rickman ever made* but it's a nice example anyway. It shouts out "Look at me World, I'm different" with a gay Anglo/Spanish accent.

*And because of that I've got a Rickman Monty frame for sale if anyone is interested.

Offline TeeBone

  • A-Grade
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
    • View Profile
Re: rickman monty
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2010, 02:49:56 pm »
Now that is ugly. :-[

Now them's some words coming from a bloke with a VF!
Destined to a life behind bars. A garage full of KTM's and a 73 CR 250M Honda....H7 250 Monty will be at Harrow!
A "never was" of the Nineties...

Offline monte34

  • B-Grade
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
    • View Profile
Re: rickman monty
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2010, 07:00:05 pm »
PM sent senor Firko.

SAABCOMBI

  • Guest
Re: rickman monty
« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2010, 04:43:38 am »
why would anyone bought a rickman montesa, and disregard a VR montesa. The VR was a 100% better bike all round.

Offline jerry

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
  • Beware the work ethic of the evil
    • View Profile
Re: rickman monty
« Reply #6 on: August 04, 2010, 10:09:46 am »
I think your all being a bit harsh. That bike has feelings you know! Having said that it got me thinking. What is the ugliest bike ever made? Something that is truly offensive to the eye. DKW's with leading link forks maybe. Anything after 1985 maybe? Jerry

firko

  • Guest
Re: rickman monty
« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2010, 10:52:27 am »
Quote
Why would anyone bought a rickman montesa, and disregard a VR montesa
A few years back we did a vintage 250 shootout session for ADB which never went to print due to photo problems*. During that test we got to ride both the VR Cappra and the Rickman Monty with the very same engine. At that time I didn't have my fondness for aftermarket framed bikes so I went into it with the same attitude as Dave. I thought the Rickman was a dated, funny looking thing. Riding it sure changed my mind though. The Rickman was a better balanced bike and despite it's humungous steel tank was noticably lighter (VR Cappra 213 lbs...Rickman Monty 198lbs). I remember GE starting the test hating the Rickman but finishing the day placing it second to the OSSA Phantom. I didn't place it that high but loved it anyway.

*We redid the shootout a few months later but because the Rickman had been sold, it missed out the second time.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2010, 10:55:37 am by firko »

Offline bazza

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2353
    • View Profile
Re: rickman monty
« Reply #8 on: August 04, 2010, 07:10:16 pm »
hey Firko what about Ugly betty?
Once you go black  you will never go back - allblacks
Maico - B44 -1976 CR250- 66 Mustang YZF450,RM250
Embrace patina

firko

  • Guest
Re: rickman monty
« Reply #9 on: August 04, 2010, 08:01:03 pm »
Quote
hey Firko what about Ugly betty?
She started life with a Zundapp engine Mikey.....different animal. Still a little plain though.

SAABCOMBI

  • Guest
Re: rickman monty
« Reply #10 on: August 05, 2010, 08:00:07 am »
l do agree with that comment mark, l alway believed that the 68-69 greeves 250, 360 griffon, QBE, where ugly, until l rode one, it was as fast as other makes, handled very well, and quiet light. remember the story about the ugly duckling, this model greeves fits that story.