Author Topic: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)  (Read 22119 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BAHNZY

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1149
    • View Profile
2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« on: April 18, 2010, 03:57:32 pm »
As I was not at the Nationals, I was curious as to the specification of bikes belonging to the riders listed below, what bikes are twin shock (i.e. EVO based) bikes as apart from a linkage rear suspended bike?

111 - ?
342 - ?
141 - ?
157 - ?
48 - ?
54 - ?
999 - ?
857 - ?
51 - ?
82 - ?
43a - ?
314 - ?
65 - ?
152 - ?
26 - ?
23 - ?
« Last Edit: May 01, 2010, 07:03:25 pm by Bahnsy »
Rod (BAHNZY) Bahn

Offline Nathan S

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 7275
  • HEAVEN #818
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2010, 06:58:17 pm »
999= Blinged up '82 CR480.
152 = would have been the Maico-esque 4-stroke (JFS? JBS?), I think.
157 = Some sort of Honda, not his usual Maico.

Well, its a start at least...
The good thing about telling the truth is that you don't have to remember what you said.

Offline caps 999

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1762
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2010, 07:01:38 pm »
simons was a twin shock with a real sr500 look unsure of exact details of the bike but was twinshock
MUGEN power

Offline BAHNZY

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1149
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2010, 07:21:40 pm »
Thus Far,
111 - (Twin Shock)
342 -
141 -
157 -
48 - (If he was riding the KTM 501 = Linkage)
54 -
999 - (Linkage)
857 -
51 - (Usual ride is a RM500 = Linkage)
82 -
43a -
314 -
65 - (Usual ride is a RM400 = Twinshock)
152 -
26 -
23 - (Usual ride is a RM400 = Twinshock)

TWINSHOCK = 3
LINKAGE = 3
« Last Edit: May 01, 2010, 07:12:59 pm by Bahnsy »
Rod (BAHNZY) Bahn

090

  • Guest
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2010, 07:25:30 pm »
Okay, that is all you want to know. Tony Cavel is twin shock.
I think Simon Healy rode pre 85 as well.

Offline BAHNZY

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1149
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2010, 07:55:49 pm »
Went back and re-read my original post, if i had 1/2 a brain i'd be dangerous.
The list was the finishing order for the Pre85 class. What i would like to know is how many;
EVOLUTION (or) EVOLUTION based bikes contested the PRE85 class.

Sorry Guys ???
Rod (BAHNZY) Bahn

Offline TeeBone

  • A-Grade
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2010, 08:14:59 pm »
Gav Pengelly - # 342

Destined to a life behind bars. A garage full of KTM's and a 73 CR 250M Honda....H7 250 Monty will be at Harrow!
A "never was" of the Nineties...

Offline VMX247

  • Megastar
  • *******
  • Posts: 8766
  • Western Australia
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2010, 11:14:36 pm »
OK help me out here.  :-\
I thought twin shock was an American word for two of those things hitt'n ya from behind..bit like 2T and 4T...
What year did the twin shock bit come in ???
cheers
Best is in the West !!

Offline motomaniac

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2448
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2010, 12:06:32 am »
OK help me out here.  :-\
I thought twin shock was an American word for two of those things hitt'n ya from behind..bit like 2T and 4T...
What year did the twin shock bit come in ???
cheers

I thought it was UK thing.Interestingly enough the statisics show 100% twin forks!

Offline GMC

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3693
  • Broadford, Vic
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2010, 10:22:09 am »
Interestingly enough the statisics show 100% twin forks!

No Brent, not quite....

G.M.C.  Bringing the past into the future

Shock horror, its here at last...
www.geoffmorrisconcepts.com

For the latest in GMC news...
http://www.geoffmorrisconcepts.com/8/news/

Offline motomaniac

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2448
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2010, 11:24:04 am »
Damn! how about twin footpegs?

Offline BAHNZY

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1149
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2010, 10:10:37 pm »
Thus Far,
111 - (Twin Shock)
342 - (CR480 = Linkage)
141 -
157 - (Twin Shock)
48 - (If he was riding the KTM 501 = Linkage)
54 -
999 - (Linkage)
857 -
51 - (Usual ride is a RM500 = Linkage)
82 -
43a -
314 -
65 - (Usual ride is a RM400 = Twinshock)
152 - (Twin Shock)
26 -
23 - (Usual ride is a RM400 = Twinshock)

TWINSHOCK = 5
LINKAGE = 4
« Last Edit: May 01, 2010, 07:14:52 pm by Bahnsy »
Rod (BAHNZY) Bahn

Offline Nathan S

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 7275
  • HEAVEN #818
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #12 on: April 19, 2010, 10:29:57 pm »
Was Simon Healy the guy on the KX250/KDX400 hybrid?

What was Martin Russel actually riding?
The good thing about telling the truth is that you don't have to remember what you said.

Offline caps 999

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1762
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2010, 07:33:14 am »
157 was linkage it was a 83 480
MUGEN power

Offline TC91

  • C-Grade
  • **
  • Posts: 81
    • View Profile
Re: 2010 NATS (Side Topic)
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2010, 09:13:13 pm »
If I have linkage front end and 2 shocks what does that make it