I spotted this in the Age yesterday.
If I remember correctly Keith was the owner of the Deep Creek motorcycle park in Bulla.
I think it was the Airport that made him shut it down?
He tried to set up another track closer to Gladstone Park.
He had a demo day there in 86 in front of a heap of QC's and other guys with letters after their names, trying to convince them that a track wouldn't be that bad a thing.
I strayed off the main line & hit a rock in the grass & went over the bars landing on my head, I was pretty ratshit but had to pretend I was fine so as not to upset the apple cart.
Couldn't ride for 4 weeks after that.
I hope he has a win, I had to pick the missus up from Tulla last Sat. Cost me $36.00 to get out of the place after her plane was delayed.
Ken Mongrels
Sunbury couple in battle over airport parking
ANDREW HEASLEY March 16, 2010
IN A battle of David and Goliath proportions, a couple in their 70s are mounting a legal challenge against the Commonwealth Government and Melbourne Airport that could overturn the airport's master plan.
Keith and Norma McLaughlin, both 73 from Sunbury, are challenging the airport's monopoly on parking. They are challenging its long-term expansion plans at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
At the centre of the dispute are 13 hectares the McLaughlins have owned since the mid-1980s that adjoin the airport boundary. The land is just 350 metres from the main terminal building, but the approved airport master plan shows no right of access to it.
The McLaughlins want to develop the land by building extra car parking - in competition to the existing airport car parks - and erecting office buildings.
Last week, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission found Melbourne Airport earned $94.8 million from parking last year - the highest figure of any airport in the country.
The McLaughlins say the airport master plan limits their right of access to the land and affects their quest to develop it. They want the tribunal to overturn federal Transport Minister Anthony Albanese's approval.
The tribunal has already ruled that the McLaughlins have a case to hear and it will review Mr Albanese's decision.
Two formidable legal teams are scheduled to line up for the tribunal showdown. These two teams are lined up against the McLaughlins. Mr Albanese is represented by the might of the office of the Australian Government Solicitor, with barrister Stephen Donaghue.
The airport, which is a ''joined party'' in the action, is represented by heavyweights Coors Westgarth Chambers, with Adrian Finanzio as counsel.
As for the McLaughlins, they are being assisted by family friend Eric Wilson, a former IT columnist for The Age who is not a lawyer, but who has helped the McLaughlins win their battle to be heard by the tribunal.
The case begins tomorrow.