I think the problem with the modern 4T is that their trying to 2T them to attract 2t riders. They're using 2t bottom ends, short stroking them and making them rev to 13,000 rpm. What do you think will happen?
Unfortunately it makes the bikes suck for 4t riders. I had a WR250F and I had to ride it on redline to get any go out of it. That's not why I ride 4T's. I want low down lugging that a long stroke 4T is all about. They don't make that anymore.
I bought a 2000 KTM520 back in 2001. It's done a lot of K's and has had one top end rebuild that cost $1,300. All my mates ride KTM's and all have had good runs out of them with occasional top end freshen ups all running at around $1,000 - $1,300.
When the KTM 4T EXC'S where first released in 2000 It was stressed by KTM and the magazines that these where high maintanence race bikes and not to be bought by joe average trailrider.
If you want a performing reliable 4T trailbike with good suspension consider a KTM LC4
Firko, the bike for you would be the 96+ ATK with the offset crossover frame. Low seat height, good handling, as light as a modern 4T. Just feel heavier to ride because of the flywheel inertia. You would just have to upgrade the suspension, but a set of later model KTM forks will slip right in.
http://www.bikesales.com.au/all-bikes/private/details.aspx?R=3148852&__sid=126A4AB6195E&__Qpb=true&Cr=0&__Ns=p_RankSort_Int32|1||p_Make_String|0||p_Model_String|0||p_YearMade_Int32|1||p_PriceSort_Decimal|1&keywords=&__N=1432%20604%201430%201429%201428%204294964316&seot=1&__Nne=15&trecs=1&silo=1400
And Frosty, XR600's where notorious for eating choke butterflys. Taking the choke out was part of the pre ride setup back in the day. They're getting cheap now and would be worth snapping up.