I still dont get what lesson he has to learn
the kid was found to be INNOCENT
He might be a lazy useless git who wont clean his own bike (i dont know i never heard of the kid till this) but even if he is it dont make him a rapist .
Can somone please explain to me what lesson he should have learnt from this
I think its more of a case of some of us on here learning lessons , ie just because somone says somthing about somone it dont make it true .
The biggest casualty in most court cases is the truth, how did OJ get off.
And in no way am I saying Darcy was guilty, just that we'll never know and sadly some mud will stick
Of course shit will stick with that attitude