Have tried a few gearing combinations Lozza and try as you might, the 4T get the power to the ground much better than the 2T.
In the Pre 78s 263 and over, I had the 77 AW honking but could only manage a 5th in the final as the 4T made the 2T look stupid off the start line and they were some of my better starts on the day. Unfortunately, you cant win races from the back of the pack on the start grid.
Ray Stevens power to the ground on the 500 was amazing to watch when you sitting behind him (not thru choice I might add
) but it was what it was. I spoke to one of the other guys in the same class who has a long racing history and is no slouch and he had formed the same opinion and couldnt get his 2T to the front either, I cant remember the results overall but I would believe 4T finished 1,2 & 3 in the pre 78s.
Now saying this, i believe the 2T are still the go on th MX side of things and In not about to change the whole Maico stable over this issue, just would like a DT bike that is able to get the power to the ground smoothly and consistantly, sure its all got to do with the firing of the engne but I'm just not that technically advanced,I just like riding and observing
It might only need 1 ratio changed
Which would be? It's a bit of a problem when all Maico 4 speeds are the same ratios. As for gearing, you can always get a compromise but you'll never get the ideal. You don't see too many 250 Maicos blitzing the field for that reason. It's not a problem for the 400/440 because of the great torque available.
I do have to say the 2T did finish 3rd in the pre 70 open against the big bores and was quick thru the dog leg because of the gearaing and weight issues, (no not mine) I reckon my old square barrell has more tow than the 400. Saying that , Keith Stacker had done a little head work with it