if you read the first post of this thread the question is what has changed from 1933 to now ? It doesn't matter if you think that the world is flat or not but since you mentioned it when it was thought that the world was flat it took a denier to sail around the world and prove the official science of the day wrong just as later on it took a denier to prove that the earth revolved around the sun and not the sun around the earth. The alarmists don't have a good record do they? No one sailed of the edge of the world yet.
Columbus/Galileo were not "deniers" at all they were heretics. Big difference between a heretic and a denier. That is despite mountains of evidence the denier still won't acknowledge they might just be wrong and stick to their opinion. A heretic is the opposite they believe evidence over popular opinion
Prominent environmentalists are not climate scientists.
What happening in Fukushima exactly?
The term heretic refers to one who goes against , ie denies the supposed truth of the established religion, :-a person believing in or practising religious heresy.
synonyms: dissident, dissenter, nonconformist, unorthodox thinker, heterodox thinker, apostate, freethinker, iconoclast, schismatic, renegade;
sceptic, agnostic, atheist, non-theist, non-believer, unbeliever, idolater, idolatress, pagan, heathen;
separatist, sectarian, revisionist;
raretergiversator, recreant, recusant, nullifidian;
archaicpaynim
ie a denier.
My point about the prominent environmentalists stands , the global warming debate has taken over all environmental issues , they don't need to be climate scientists , although many are, to see that.
Fukushima is still not contained , is still leaking radiation , is still killing sea life .This is real not a model which the climate scientists are using.