« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 84 ATK560  (Read 7278 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mick25

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1162
  • Hunter valley NSW
    • View Profile
Re: 84 ATK560
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2014, 06:08:47 pm »
It just needs a smaller tank ;) and that chain re rooted to make it a foot shorter :o
Logged

Simo63

  • Guest
Re: 84 ATK560
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2014, 06:55:50 pm »
Quote from: Ted on March 11, 2014, 05:30:41 pm
Quote from: Simo63 on March 11, 2014, 05:19:32 pm
Quote from: Ted on March 11, 2014, 05:07:20 pm
Anyway, it looks like I'm picking up a moto sickle from you at Canberra round. ( fu...in uteless qlder's ) ;D ;D ;D

We love ya Ted :)

Don't forget the pizzas :D

Not a chance mate .. thick crust BBQ Chicken and Bacon with extra toppings just for you .... and a couple cans of JD to wash it down with :)
Logged

Offline Ted

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2800
    • View Profile
Re: 84 ATK560
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2014, 06:58:03 pm »
Luv you too Simo ;D
Logged
81 YZ 465 H   77 RM 125 B

Offline Nathan S

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 7275
  • HEAVEN #818
    • View Profile
Re: 84 ATK560
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2014, 10:48:23 pm »
Quote from: mick25 on March 11, 2014, 06:08:47 pm
It just needs a smaller tank ;) and that chain re rooted to make it a foot shorter :o

AMP Link. Isolates the rear suspension from the effect of chain tension. Apparently you wither loved it or hated it, with the better riders more likely to hate it.
The idea is the same as the ill-fated BMW 450/Husky 449/511 where the front sprocket is in line with the swingarm pivot - I've ridden a 449 and there was lots of weirdness, but I can't say that I thought the lack of chain torque on the rear suspension was noticable.

Logged
The good thing about telling the truth is that you don't have to remember what you said.

Offline Tahitian_Red

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1109
  • Mugen ME480
    • View Profile
Re: 84 ATK560
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2014, 02:30:51 am »
Quote from: mick25 on March 11, 2014, 06:08:47 pm
It just needs a smaller tank ;) and that chain re rooted to make it a foot shorter :o

I love everything about the ATK's, except the tank.  I guess the Rotax motor is so tall that the tank has to be that high to have enough fuel capacity???
Logged
The "Factory Novice"
California, USA

'74 Suzuki TM100, '75 Bultaco 250 Pursang, '77 Honda XR75, '77 Suzuki RM125B, '77 Yamaha YZ400D, '79 Honda CR250RZ Moto-X Fox Replica, '83 Honda ME480RD Mugen

Offline evo550

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
    • View Profile
Re: 84 ATK560
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2014, 12:08:57 pm »
Logged

Offline VMX Andrew

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 961
    • View Profile
Re: 84 ATK560
« Reply #21 on: March 14, 2014, 09:52:06 am »
 ;D
Logged

Offline firko

  • Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 6578
    • View Profile
Re: 84 ATK560
« Reply #22 on: March 14, 2014, 11:02:35 am »
The dirt track version.....Jonesy's DT600
                                                                                   
                                                                                   
Logged
'68 Yamaha DT1 enduro, '69 Yamaha 'DT1 from Hell' '69 DT1'Dunger from Hell, '69 Cheney Yamaha 360, 70 Maico 350 (2 off), '68 Hindall Ducati 250, Hindall RT2MX, Hindall YZ250a , Cycle Factory RT2MX flat tracker, Yamaha 1T250J, Maico 250 trials, '71, Boyd and Stellings TM400, Shell OW72,750 Yamaha

Simo63

  • Guest
Re: 84 ATK560
« Reply #23 on: March 14, 2014, 11:15:27 am »
Quote from: firko on March 14, 2014, 11:02:35 am
The dirt track version.....Jonesy's DT600
                                                                                   
                                                                                   

Now that is a hot looking ride right there  8)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
« previous next »