« Reply #14 on: January 16, 2014, 09:41:59 am »
One thing that bugs me is why don’t the motorcycle Mags test any of these cheap offerings and then tell it how it is?
IMO anything that's own ACP is not worth reading anymore. Yes most of the mags these days are just fluff and adds boring as bat shit.
The dirt bike magazine scene in Oz is largely driven by advertising revenue focused Hooray Harrys with little or no knowledge or appreciation of anything older than 5 years. A carburetted YZ450 is considered a primitive vintage bike to some of them. I've got a bit of experience dealing with these blokes and know well that there are some talented and dedicated exceptions but on the whole the magazines are driven by the advertisers so it's rare to find any hard criticism of bikes or products (oe events and personalities). They're all so slick and formulated, I just don't read them any more and I'm sure Geoff Eldridge would be turning in his grave if he could see what his beloved ADB has become. I'm in regular contact with many of the old school moto journos from not so long ago and to a man we're all a bit disappointed in what Gen X has done with Moto Media. It could be so much better if they weren't such soft cocks, afraid to tell the truth. I'd love to write a no holds barred track test on bikes like the Foxico but it'll never happen because it doesn't tie in with their reader demographic.....
« Last Edit: January 16, 2014, 10:14:22 am by firko »
Logged
'68 Yamaha DT1 enduro, '69 Yamaha 'DT1 from Hell' '69 DT1'Dunger from Hell, '69 Cheney Yamaha 360, 70 Maico 350 (2 off), '68 Hindall Ducati 250, Hindall RT2MX, Hindall YZ250a , Cycle Factory RT2MX flat tracker, Yamaha 1T250J, Maico 250 trials, '71, Boyd and Stellings TM400, Shell OW72,750 Yamaha