I posted this earlier in the other thread Nathan started, but this seems to be where all the action is, some I'll put it up here. I also forgot about about the whole lug position when I recently bought some forks for an evo project and am in process of buying the correct forks.
On a practicality basis I dont have any real issue on the use of drum brakes and associated forks (maybe exclude USD if any exist) if the rules were changed to allow, I think it wouldn't improve the performance much and allow more choice/availability and allow bikes to be kept as all one brand.
The issue arises if we then say any air cooled engine is allowed, then we start down the path of bikes similar to those overseas, ie; RM500 engined RM400, KX500 engined KX250A5 etc. But as this would result in a significant performance gain, it could easily be written into the rules that only engines from twin shock/non linkage bikes could be used. I wouldn't even have a great issue with a disc braked, air cooled, twin shock bike (are there any?) being made evo legal with a drum brake front end.
I suppose the problem arises when you give a little bit of latitude in the rules, people will stretch that to breaking point. This could be overcome with rewritten very specific rules, but then you don't want to turn the rules into something resembling legislation that you have to be a QC to comprehend