Author Topic: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha  (Read 32044 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Tahitian_Red

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1109
  • Mugen ME480
    • View Profile
The "Factory Novice"
California, USA

'74 Suzuki TM100, '75 Bultaco 250 Pursang, '77 Honda XR75, '77 Suzuki RM125B, '77 Yamaha YZ400D, '79 Honda CR250RZ Moto-X Fox Replica, '83 Honda ME480RD Mugen

Offline gdr

  • A-Grade
  • ****
  • Posts: 489
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2013, 08:39:19 pm »
I agree Johnny to me its just a trail bike and a over rated one at that .Did it ever win anything ?
HONDA THE POWER OF DREAMS

Offline FDR

  • B-Grade
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2013, 09:36:16 pm »
GDR have another read of Johhny O post you may be confused.
Various versions of these bikes were raced by Aberg in World championship's with great success, also considering the weight disadvantage up againgst lightweight factory Japanese bikes.
I have a friend who has a genuine Pro-Fab HL and the bike steers and tracks superbly.

Offline SON

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2013, 10:08:28 pm »
GDR have another read of Johhny O post you may be confused.
Various versions of these bikes were raced by Aberg in World championship's with great success, also considering the weight disadvantage up againgst lightweight factory Japanese bikes.
I have a friend who has a genuine Pro-Fab HL and the bike steers and tracks superbly.

I have a genuine real Torsten Hallman Aberg and I have had it since I was young enough and fast enough to ride it, (over 30 years ago)
It tracks superbly but it doesn't steer
I have a C&J XR500 it steers and tracks and is so much better to ride than the TT

Offline JohnnyO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4658
  • Qld
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2013, 10:12:59 pm »
The HL was a little dated when the C&J 500 Hondas hit the market.. Things changed fast in the late 70's early 80's.

Offline SON

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2013, 10:33:40 pm »
My C&J 500 is the 79 built Alan West bike on the Revs cover
My Aberg was built in 78/79 I have owned it since 1980

Montynut

  • Guest
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2013, 10:40:51 pm »
Graeme the Aberg you have would be a very early build as I remember it racing in mid 78. The original owner told me that it took ages to get it from the UK so I would suspect it was an early one. When did the first original HL frame kits become available?

Offline gdr

  • A-Grade
  • ****
  • Posts: 489
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2013, 10:49:34 pm »
FDR I must be one of these people that know nothing of the history of MX thats why I am asking the question what have they won .
HONDA THE POWER OF DREAMS

Offline evo550

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2013, 10:53:33 pm »
Interesting that Johnson's and Lechein's bikes had a different swingarm....and forks to this one? I thought Johnson ran the #22 in '82 and Lechein ran #224 ?
« Last Edit: March 12, 2013, 10:58:19 pm by evo550 »

Offline JohnnyO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4658
  • Qld
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2013, 11:05:09 pm »
My C&J 500 is the 79 built Alan West bike on the Revs cover
My Aberg was built in 78/79 I have owned it since 1980
The first HL500 was built in '77 a couple of years before the C&J.. As i said earlier technology changed rapidly in the late 70's and the HL frame design was soon outdated.

Offline SON

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #25 on: March 12, 2013, 11:31:12 pm »
Greg Ian's bike is a US Hallman not UK / NL HL
Johnny O I certainly remember Vertually every change on everything MX from H S and Y from 76 to 85
it's not the technology changes that made the Honda better it, the Aberg has no steering lock and it was/is too tall, the C&J was based on the 78/79 CR250R which had steering lock and did turn.
I raced the Aberg at Jilliby, Dunlop Lea and Foster Park, it only worked for me at Jilliby with its berms, Dunlop Lea was a killer with the deep sand and ruts, Foster Park was fun.
I rode both bikes as registered trail bikes but there is no comparison.
I have CCMs and other trick Thumpers but the C&J is the best so far,
I say so far since I honestly think the HS that GMC has built will be even better,

Offline JohnnyO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4658
  • Qld
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #26 on: March 12, 2013, 11:42:20 pm »
I'm glad you gave me a bit of a comparison between them.. I want a 4stroke Evo bike and i'm tossing up between a few. Where does a '79 CCM fit in? and the other i'm thinking about is another '84 510 Husky(had one a few years back)

Offline GMC

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3693
  • Broadford, Vic
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #27 on: March 12, 2013, 11:53:23 pm »
the C&J was based on the 78/79 CR250R which had steering lock and did turn.

Funny thing is, the 78/79 CR250R is also based on the Husky frame
G.M.C.  Bringing the past into the future

Shock horror, its here at last...
www.geoffmorrisconcepts.com

For the latest in GMC news...
http://www.geoffmorrisconcepts.com/8/news/

Offline JohnnyO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4658
  • Qld
    • View Profile
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #28 on: March 13, 2013, 12:01:59 am »
the C&J was based on the 78/79 CR250R which had steering lock and did turn.

Funny thing is, the 78/79 CR250R is also based on the Husky frame
Too true.. for some reason the HL rear shock position ended up more upright though and Honda pulled the rake in a bit more

Montynut

  • Guest
Re: Pro-Tec HL Yamaha
« Reply #29 on: March 13, 2013, 06:56:41 am »
Greg Ian's bike is a US Hallman not UK / NL HL
Johnny O I certainly remember Vertually every change on everything MX from H S and Y from 76 to 85
it's not the technology changes that made the Honda better it, the Aberg has no steering lock and it was/is too tall, the C&J was based on the 78/79 CR250R which had steering lock and did turn.
I raced the Aberg at Jilliby, Dunlop Lea and Foster Park, it only worked for me at Jilliby with its berms, Dunlop Lea was a killer with the deep sand and ruts, Foster Park was fun.
I rode both bikes as registered trail bikes but there is no comparison.
I have CCMs and other trick Thumpers but the C&J is the best so far,
I say so far since I honestly think the HS that GMC has built will be even better,

So did Ian get his through the UK as that was the impression he gave me when we were talking at Bulahdelah last year. The Hallman bikes were later right?

That is the problem your memory on exact timing fades over the years. The reason I thought it was '78 was I thought I raced him on my VB360 but the VE414 came out in mid '78 and I rode that during late '78 and most part of '79.