Why do 76-81 YZ's sell so much cheaper than the others?
Without the obvious "because they're sh*t" I have noticed that lets say a race ready 79 YZ 250F in good cosmetic condition will sell for far less than a similar bike of the other 3 brands?
(Yes I know there are lots of other brands but I am comparing the 4 Japs) (Is that racists to say Jap when it's not a slider?)
I have seen the above bike struggle to make $2500 but the others, especially the Hondas, (Not Mugen) go for $4000+. The only one that seems to hold its own is the 250G & there's another puzzle. I would have thought the H with 43mm forks in lieu of 38mm & a 5 speed in lieu of a 6 would be a better choice (2nd, 3rd & sometimes 4th is all I use on most tracks) but I hear most reguard the G as one of the best Evos ever. (Others words not mine, you know the whole messenger thing)
Yes the YZ motors were a bit peaky (Not that bad), the 77-79 monoshock needed some work, (But only good riders could tell) but the rest of the bike was as good as any other!
My point is I honestly don't think my laptimes be any better or worse on any of the 4 once used to the bike. My times are so spasmodic you would struggle to get an average (Timed with a sundial or calendar) So why are the Yammys so cheap compared to others? I know there are some sort after models but as a whole they do suffer.
Anyone looking to get into the sport should look for a Yammy. Cheap to buy, lots of NOS parts still available through local dealers & good resale value. (Can't go too much backwards)
Opinions please.