Author Topic: cameras - what's good  (Read 4883 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tossa

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2087
    • View Profile
Re: cameras - what's good
« Reply #30 on: January 04, 2013, 04:09:51 pm »
I have and use a Canon EOS 60D and I love it.. come to think of it, so do all the guys in the Heaven VMX Club.


Don't hear any complaints from the VMXWA or Pre85MXWA clubs either about Christines shots!!!!
1973 Rickman Zundapp Metisse, to rebuild
1979 Husqvarna WR250
1974 Husqvarna MAG CR250

Offline Mrs Hardo

  • C-Grade
  • **
  • Posts: 100
    • View Profile
Re: cameras - what's good
« Reply #31 on: January 04, 2013, 04:13:15 pm »
I have and use a Canon EOS 60D and I love it.. come to think of it, so do all the guys in the Heaven VMX Club.


Don't hear any complaints from the VMXWA or Pre85MXWA clubs either about Christines shots!!!!

I like your quote about "you chose the bike and she chose the camera".. Dave and I did the same. Great partnership  :)

Offline Rusty

  • C-Grade
  • **
  • Posts: 138
    • View Profile
Re: cameras - what's good
« Reply #32 on: January 07, 2013, 12:33:13 pm »
Anything I take is for the web so I don't worry too much about how many megazillion pixels it is.  I run an old D50 Nikon that has the motor drive in the body - that way I have far more lenses to chose from.   Just bought a Sigma 150-500 that I will play around with and see how I like the longer lens.  Have been using a 300 fixed for years but want just a little more reach.
I look at cameras for moto photography as needing to be reasonably inexpensive as over the years I have had a couple fail and both times the photo shop reported to the insurance company that as they had dust in places there should not be dust it must be considered that they were not being used in an appropriate manner   ???
Poke that bone back in and wrap it up tight sport - I am racing the second moto.