I witnessed Lac Mac bashing his boot on Firkos Maicos gear lever at that Amaroo meeting and it really was ugly. These young magazine guys generally think that vintage is a bit of a wank so expecting them to respect a bike that they deem to be an old clunker is a big ask. I wouldn't let any of them near my bikes either.
I don't know what it is about ADB that turns me off. When you compare the production quality, content, photography and number of pages to both Dirt Action and the American opposition, it's a much better product. What it lacks is intelligence and soul. The magazine tends to lower itself to the 12-20 demographic thereby bypassing the more mature reader. In the GE days I felt like I was part of the ADB 'family' but with the current set up it's hard to feel even the slightest bit of that warm and cosy family feel. Despite all of the external glitz and glamour, ADB has no inner soul. The opposition no little better except for Racer X. Publisher Scott Wallenberg is a serious vintage racer and it shows in the balance within the magazine. He has a similar outlook to GE and I tend to think that if Eldridge was alive today, ADB would have taken a similar route to Racer X. MXA is stuck in some sort of Jody Weisel time warp. Has his Jodys Box column ever changed from his dumb Crazy Dave and Jody at the races crap? Pick up a 1980 copy and the current copy and with the exception of the feature bikes, nothing has changed. It's yesterdays hero.
Thank god for VMX. That 'part of the family' feel that was such an attractive facet of GE era ADB is alive and well in VMX. There's a good vibe in VMX that really brings the world vintage family together. Classic Dirt Bike from the UK is attempting to emulate the VMX vibe and while still being way off the standard of VMX is still a good magazine and worth supporting. So, for me these days it's Racer X for my modern touch AMCN for my general news and gossip and VMX and CDB for my old bike fix. The rest have lost me.