I'll try again........
Very well put crash & Burn.
What I don't get is if they are sitting on a pile of hot rocks, why don't they use thermohydro like Un Zud.
+1
I know the attractions of nuclear but even accepting the engineers reassurances of guaranteed safety (which is obviously absolute bullshit given the latest events) the question has always been 'what do you do with the radioactive spent fuel?'. And don't give me bullshit that its being safe on the bottom of the sea for the last 50 years. It's got to be guaranteed safe, not 'maybe with a bit of luck' safe, for 20,000+ years.
And don't get me started about the forking French who get 80% of their electricity from nuclear, and thereby putting all the world at risk, and then being the 'holier than thou' reduce your carbon pollution advocates. If they haven't got an agenda and ulterior motive I haven't seen one. fork the French and their selfish ways.
Now we have 'The Experts' saying "gee we were unlucky, the plant survived the earthquake but we got the double whammy of a tsunami!!!" Earthquake = tsunami, tsunami = earthquake, Japan the most earthquake prone, the most tsunami prone country on earth - who would have thought!!!
And geothermal is probably the most concentrated natural occurring source of energy there is.
Venting off.