maybe I'm the only one seeing it this way, MA need to quantify what and how consitutes a "National Title", every event has been run differently, why, because it's a free for all. and by the looks everybody thinks differently, so lets make our governing body decide and set CLEAR guidelines.
are we getting there yet, MA says you must wear a helmet, so we all do, so why not for something as important as a National title.
I agree with you all, i dont agree with the lack of defitnition and clear requirements for a National Title race, or is it simply "that will do", your just a bunch of old blokes, who really cares, well I do!!!!!!!!
Cheers Worms
Presumably, this allows each year's Nationals to have its own character, rather than being bland, cookie-cutter reruns of lasts year's event at a different track?
Presumably, each venue/host club will have different requirements, and if we demand everything meets a larger set of criteria, then we risk losing those venues/clubs as promoters?
Presumably, the CMX Commission will not approve the Supp Regos for a CMX Nats that specifies (say) two, two lap races to determine the National Championships?
The Australian Rally Championship is a joke for many reasons - but one of them is that all of the events are forced to run in the exact same format. They're as dull as dishwater for the competitors and the spectators, and the organisers are too busy making the event fit the format to actually have time to make it an event that competitors want...
I do understand what you're saying, but I'm just not sure that the solution isn't going to bring more dramas that the 'problem'.
Has anyone won an Aussie CMX Championship without working for it? Has there ever been an undeserving winner due to the format that events have been run under?