I think most of the pro pre'78 people are missing the point of the discussion in regards to the pre'75 club in WA. The suggestions made on what we do and have done over the past 15 years has proven what can be done to foster this class. The ideas have been presented to try and show who it can be done. All the other states have doen it differently. Fair enough,. But look at the consequences now. Not a hell of a lot of vision there - oh, except for predicting the demise of pre'75 and hailing pre'90 and those that "relate to it" as the saviours of "our sport". Give me a break. If another person gets on here and makes this prediction, who is not currently on the committee of a club promoting Vintage MX, I'll spew over my keyboard.
This cut-off is purely to do with suspension - nothing else. Track damage allegations aside, the idea is to have all of the bikes complying with the simple 7 and 4 rule (including sidecars) - real vintage MX. Everyone is competing on an equal suspension basis. And, like it or lump it, this is what you will have to ride in this club. Young or old you are riding machines of the same supension travel.
If the club proposed to bring in the pre'78 class to race, what do you think most people would go out and source - that's right, a pre'78 bike. Why? - cause they are just more plush to ride. Simple. The pre'75 bikes would be ridden less for the easier to ride pre '78 machines. This is what the WA pre'85 club has being set-up to cater for - the longer travel machines. People can belong to both clubs and enjoy the benefits of both eras in the one state - perfect.
This argument for the suspension cut-off from the VMXWA club was based upon some very sound thinking on the part of the foundation members and continues with the current membership. If this same thinking was used in other parts of the country, I doubt we would be having this discussion. It is not the members of the VMXWA club who have been shortsighted...