It's one of those "vibe" things Nathan. Not everything can be measured, photographed and sent away for analysis (like some other "riverting" topics).
This is getting creepy, my chum Ross and I agreeing on things is happening way too frequently for my liking
.
I'm rarely at a loss for words but I got a bit lost when trying to define the "why" in Nathans question. Ross's vibe thing is exactly what I was looking for. The success of age group racing is indefinable, it just feels right and it works. As in other sports (
as I mentioned earlier) why shouldn't it be accepted that older sportsmen be allowed the opportunity to compete with their age peers? Imagine a 50 year old rugby player being expected to ruck down with 25 year olds or that same 50 year old having to line up in a sprint race next to a 20 year old? Nobody would seriously consider doing that but because it's vintage motocross it seems it's not relevent or needed? The success of all post "glory days" sports is based around creating an environment that allows older competitors a platform to continue their sporting life way past their 'use by date'. The Masters Games, Golden Oldies Rugby and many other veteran age specific sporting series have taken on world importance as more and more Baby Boomers and Gen X sportsmen wish to remain in their sport.
The Golden Oldies World Rugby Festival is being held in Sydney in September/October and they're expecting 4000 entrants comprising of 200 teams from 20 countries...
all 35 and over and in November the Pan Pacific Masters Games are on on the Gold Coast with 10 000 veteran competitors competing in 33 sports including VMX and Vinduro. I mention these events to emphasise the importance that is placed on promoting sports for those of us past our sporting glory days and to see how big it's become. Australian VMX was the first to recognise that there is a potential to draw riders from retirement by creating an age group system offering parity and now similar system is used in our sport all over the world. We got it right.
To me, not beating the best , means its a hollow victory.
If winning an age group race is a hollow victory Walt, then a win in pre60/65/70 is equally as hollow because you weren't competing against the fastest and newest bikes at the meeting (
theoretically pre '75). If I use your 'hollow victory' analogy as an example, your perfect world would have all ages competing against each other in all in races. There'd be no age group racing for both riders or bikes because to win anything less than the 'main race' would be a hollow victory. My point is that
you are competing against the best of the best in your age group. Let's not forget that the all ages capacity races are still on the program. If you don't want to race in an age group,
don't! Just stick to the all ages races and everyone's happy.