C forks aren't and emulators are in the spirit??
sorry Leith, not having a shot at you but if the parts appear the identical and no-one can tell what the difference and they offer the same travel then what's to say they are not B forks except for me knowing they're not
side by side there absolutely is no visable difference and it's not cheating.
Therefore, it stands to reason the parts are in fact a flow on part and this case could be argued also. If the C motor can be used as a flow on and it is internally different then why not the forks if the caps are swapped for the period correct caps?
I'm not trying to open a can of worms or be an argumentative grub but I do see inconsistancies within the rules in regards to flow on. I only really wanted to clarify the swingarm, if fitted without floating brakes, the C rear wheel or the provision on the frame to fit a brake stay is it legal?
for the record, yes I do have the '76 125A swingarm I can use but I spent well over $100 fixing up the alloy job, I love the look of it and didn't want to simply leave it sitting on the shelf