Author Topic: XT/TT/SR500 Differences  (Read 27841 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TT5 Matt

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1538
    • View Profile
Re: XT/TT/SR500 Differences
« Reply #15 on: October 21, 2013, 11:05:46 am »
xt/tt clutch covers DO fit on a sr500e but to use the points drive you have to machine the boss in the right main case to take the points drive. counter shaft lengths change with the xt/tt/sr with the sr being abit longer for the 530 std chain size and the spacer on the counter shaft are different as well

Offline djr

  • C-Grade
  • **
  • Posts: 112
    • View Profile
Re: XT/TT/SR500 Differences
« Reply #16 on: October 27, 2013, 08:27:55 pm »
Just out of interest would anyone know the differences between SR500 and SR400 ?
Is the 400 just sleeved down or shorter stroke, or is it a different engine altogether .
can a 400 be made into a 500 ?
I believe the SR400 was still being made up until quite recently .
thanks in advance.

Offline cloggy

  • A-Grade
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
    • View Profile
Re: XT/TT/SR500 Differences
« Reply #17 on: October 31, 2013, 08:35:30 pm »
 SR is  being made now. They had a year off to dump the carb and get it through emissions.
 As far as I know it is just a short stroke 500, so maybe just crank rod and piston.

Offline curly001

  • B-Grade
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
    • View Profile
Re: XT/TT/SR500 Differences
« Reply #18 on: October 31, 2013, 10:06:39 pm »
The SR400 uses a shorter stroke crank the conrod is the same the piston is the same diameter  but longer in the gudgeon pin to top length to make up for shorter stroke. You can put a 500 crank an piston straight in. Curly

Offline djr

  • C-Grade
  • **
  • Posts: 112
    • View Profile
Re: XT/TT/SR500 Differences
« Reply #19 on: October 31, 2013, 11:29:10 pm »
Thank you for the info - Cloggy & Curly001,
 I was thinking of getting an SR400 so its handy to now it could be uprated later if I feel like it.
thanks - dave

Offline zorroz

  • A-Grade
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • View Profile
Re: XT/TT/SR500 Differences
« Reply #20 on: October 31, 2013, 11:39:02 pm »

Offline jimg1au

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3489
    • View Profile
Re: XT/TT/SR500 Differences
« Reply #21 on: January 20, 2014, 07:09:54 am »
from usa flattrack.com
To the best of my knowledge, Engine only:

 Cams are the same.
 All SR's and 1979+ TT, 1980+ XT used the 47mm intake valve. All the heads with the 2J2 valve have more fin area.
 The TT/XT models used magnesium cases and covers.
 The SR's use aluminum cases and covers
 The 78-79 SR used a larger crank wheel and the case oil scrapper for these are clearance for the larger wheel.
 In 1980 all models went to an oil pump with 5 bolts to address internal pump leakage.
 The CDI's are different for 78-79 and 80-81 SR, The late XT's 80-81 CDI is different from both SR models. You can not mix and match between the CDI parts. They need to match to series.
 The TT's were points only.
 SR's used a banded clutch.
 Transmissions are the same for all.
 There were two different sized carbs used on the SR 34mm 78-79 and 32mm 80-81, both were pumpers
 The TT/XT used a 34mm no pump carb.

 I think that is about it.

 Paul

This is my opinion only. The banded SR clutch is better, stronger and you do not tend to get the worn / spread aluminum clutch ears as quickly. Downside its more internal weight.

 I run the 79 heavy crank on mine (its for sale in the classified section) Seems to tractor off the turns better. I also run a small PVL rotor not the bigger stock flywheel. Having said all that I know many that use the smaller crank with no issues.

 Pete
is the usa j2j motor different to aust ones this is not the first time I have read the flywheels are bigger in the j2j (early pre80) sr500s