Mick, I like the idea of checking the original angle to provide a starting point, it’s something I hadn’t thought of.
RMJJ, you're right about castor not changing with suspension movement but only if the bike remains level.
Castor, rake and steering head angle are all different names for the same thing.
Reading the latest issue of MXA they give figures for most of the modern bikes on the market.
Most are 25.5-28.2 degrees rake with 114-122mm trail. Then there’s the RMZ Suzukis. Two bikes reputed to be the best turning bikes around and they are 30.2 degrees with 140mm trail for the 250 and 29.4 with 130mm of trail for the 450.
Are the Suzukis that much different or do they measure things differently?
From numbers I’ve seen for older bikes the RMZ450 is just about the same as an RH250 or a TM125.
I’ve tried to copy angles and measurements from other bikes but have now gone completely away from that idea, now I’m trying as many different setups as possible and I’ll use the one that gives the best results. The last lot of changes I made went against everything I’ve thought about motorcycle handling but produced the best result to date. Incidentally the bike is now very similar to an Eric Cheney Yamaha 500 working from scaled photos.
Motorcycle handling is a balance of so many things and rake and trail are just a part of the mix.