Author Topic: 73M Frame details.  (Read 1332 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mx250

  • Guest
73M Frame details.
« on: February 14, 2009, 03:09:33 pm »
This is the frame, marked 73m, that I'm mucking with for a maybe Vinduro bitza.

Are these standard fittings?



Were these Monties generally or the 73M bad vibrators? These are non standard reinforcing ain't they?



Offline cappra

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
  • Glendale, Arizona
    • View Profile
    • Southwest Montesa
Re: 73M Frame details.
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2009, 07:53:28 pm »
Non standard reinforcments and brackets for sure!
73M was not a vibrator!

mx250

  • Guest
Re: 73M Frame details.
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2009, 11:23:06 am »
I wonder what the story was with this frame. Every engine mount is broken, reinforced, missing and/or holes elongated ::) ???.

mx250

  • Guest
Re: 73M Frame details.
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2009, 10:04:29 am »
Is this the original tank mount for the 73M?


Offline cappra

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
  • Glendale, Arizona
    • View Profile
    • Southwest Montesa
Re: 73M Frame details.
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2009, 10:11:04 am »
It looks like a mount was added to the early frame to mount the later
"bean" tank.  The later mount used a bolt going into a threaded portion.
Looks like someone added a stud.

mx250

  • Guest
Re: 73M Frame details.
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2009, 10:37:14 am »
It looks like a mount was added to the early frame to mount the later
"bean" tank.  The later mount used a bolt going into a threaded portion.
Looks like someone added a stud.
Thanks Jared. I won't feel guilty if I cut it off to fit a Universal tank, which I have. I would like to use a Monty like the fibreglass VB's for the distinstive Monty look but I might just use what I have.