« Reply #50 on: July 24, 2013, 10:06:06 am »
If TM400R's came with Works Performance shocks, Progressive front fork springs and decent tyres their reputation would be completely different to that of a Widowmaker or Serility Clinic
Are you sure being a Suzuki dealer hasn't clouded your memories of the TM400 Graeme
? I've ridden both orange and yellow TM400's and even wrote a magazine article of my first ride experience on a TS400 and I know in my heart that the only
real cure to the TM's erratic behaviour is to either add weight to the existing CDI flywheel or fit a TS points ignition and to fit a full circle late TS crankshaft. The major flaws in the TM400 engine is the lack of flywheel with the porkchop crank and erratic CD1 mapping. Fix those problems and you're on your way to having a decent bike. The best cure of course is to do all of those things
plus fit the engine into a Cheney or Boyd and Stellings frame as I have.
All that aside though,
all Japanese bikes from the era were pretty awful but they can be made into good racers with a bit of careful development. As long as the ignition issues are addressed the TM can be a handy open class weapon.
« Last Edit: July 24, 2013, 10:08:28 am by firko »
Logged
'68 Yamaha DT1 enduro, '69 Yamaha 'DT1 from Hell' '69 DT1'Dunger from Hell, '69 Cheney Yamaha 360, 70 Maico 350 (2 off), '68 Hindall Ducati 250, Hindall RT2MX, Hindall YZ250a , Cycle Factory RT2MX flat tracker, Yamaha 1T250J, Maico 250 trials, '71, Boyd and Stellings TM400, Shell OW72,750 Yamaha