Lots of pros and cons on this one.
Mig is easy and gives a good clean weld, pretty well matches low hydrogen and that's good enough for structural work.
Bad part of Mig is the cold start, You need to make sure the start of the weld is getting penetration. Puts a lot of heat into a small area. I seem to remember that's why you can't use it on aircraft stuff.
Gas, slow but controlable, does tend to spread the heat but that's not really a bad thing.
Tig, like gas but faster and more concentrated heat. Can give a bigger temperature difference in a smaller area, as opposed to gas.
Stick, can be a bit too harsh on light material and again puts a lot of heat in a small area.
Moly tube is generaly supplied in "normalised" condition. This means it has (or should have been) heated red hot and alowed to cool in air. I figure gas welding moly is ok as long as you use a good filler rod (triple deoxidised). The spread of heat from gas welding will allow the entire joint to stabalise and cool evenly. I've often wondered about Tig with the high, localised heat input and how much this could stress the joint.
GMC, how do you deal with this in your frames? I've looked a pics of yur work (impressive!) and wondered if you've heated the joints afterwards with the gas to relieve the joints. When you think of it you would be putting the material back to "as supplied" condition ie normalised.
Then there's nickel bronze. All the specialist frame makers use this . As GMC says not much strength for a butt weld in tube but seems to work on everything else. How often does a Cheney or CCM frame break?
Funnily enough when you check Crome-moly tube manufacturers reccomendations a lot of them reccomend bronze welding.
Brent