OzVMX Forum

Clubroom => General Discussion => Topic started by: PJR on October 08, 2008, 05:27:57 pm

Title: Re: Era specific or just an error??
Post by: PJR on October 08, 2008, 05:27:57 pm
I like the year cutoffs as they are as they're based on the engineering milestones of our sport.
*The pre 65 era marked the end of the heavyweight four stroke era before the CZ led 2 stroke revolution.
*Pre 70 marked the end of the traditional piston port pre japanese era
*Pre 75 marks the end of the traditional suspension era
*Pre '78 marks the end of the first phase of the suspension evolution.
Of course there exceptions to these cutoff dates but this are the basic milestones. I don't think they need fiddling with as they've worked well for 20 years with little drama. Leave these traditional classes well alone and worry about getting the future classing right.
Title: Re: Era specific or just an error??
Post by: TM BILL on October 08, 2008, 05:47:17 pm
I like the year cutoffs as they are as they're based on the engineering milestones of our sport.
*The pre 65 era marked the end of the heavyweight four stroke era before the CZ led 2 stroke revolution.
*Pre 70 marked the end of the traditional piston port pre japanese era
*Pre 75 marks the end of the traditional suspension era
*Pre '78 marks the end of the first phase of the suspension evolution.
Of course there exceptions to these cutoff dates but this are the basic milestones. I don't think they need fiddling with as they've worked well for 20 years with little drama. Leave these traditional classes well alone and worry about getting the future classing right.

I think red devil has summed it up perfectly  :)
Title: Re: Era specific or just an error??
Post by: mike1948 on October 08, 2008, 05:48:22 pm
Keep the current classes as they are, just simplify by making EVERY bike available within those dates eligible, without alterations, without exceptions.  Just as they were manufactured & sold.