OzVMX Forum

Clubroom => General Discussion => Topic started by: skypig on November 19, 2017, 11:37:30 am

Title: Steve McQueen rates the bikes of ‘66
Post by: skypig on November 19, 2017, 11:37:30 am

Might be of interest to some.
I wish there was more of the original article.

https://www.revzilla.com/common-tread/how-good-were-the-original-scramblers-the-top-six-models-from-1966-as-tested-by-steve-mcqueen?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=11/18/2017%20-%20CT&utm_term=Common%20Tread%20%7C%20Combined

Title: Re: Steve McQueen rates the bikes of ‘66
Post by: gt96 on November 19, 2017, 04:03:30 pm

https://books.google.com.au/books?id=kSkDAAAAMBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Title: Re: Steve McQueen rates the bikes of ‘66
Post by: alexbrown64 on November 19, 2017, 05:43:57 pm

Here it is in all its techincolor glory... great read too. 

(https://wuhjvq-bn1305.files.1drv.com/y4mN0PRXpHvmZDFkhAIQcPpktNkGwwrO4-qaaHK_aOQWNYVDS5ppyi8na_qut1uRjXnYU7MDfDTY_CuwAd9uI1ZElh77B4x48A2X6jpVZyIlmCNdLudF7jy8O2QQXL92DAo13K0KPdq9w9zL-kvywMuCUDSW6kX0Sgm0s5NjKNPo9G8VlrHM7vFZxgutYigy2MkJwtqfczMR_iXUwwhyhjBJw?width=593&height=826&cropmode=none)

(https://wehjvq-bn1305.files.1drv.com/y4mYfdPpBrHDLtnsLAkHrZlg2j5htQpfq4rJqI0fdINuH4oOO1FiMq9m-75lU9Kxtb-BEJEcsshNiMz5lA0l93eBIOVjRwJYv_tI6Ao__eK6fNCBz_EuuyUtIuXJFPzE_YrHPG-ZOmyXAa1yO8mw6mwGqMsnGTNTa_gtDsraUHusY6eszts15DxX0OFIyn-m4_T7E9B8nIUKnuatzx-2VUGmA?width=548&height=848&cropmode=none)

(https://ukhjvq-bn1305.files.1drv.com/y4mb4MGvSkf1UZD8lq5Z3_gc7zXZX-Gxtvpz0A-ePskcFfeke0DFqRJmmruDW4-nutldPQT8u-iIbbmXafzHsJ5kIcGNu2p1KsWQK2Uhhr4oFAX1_u4Fo_-_PTUkaamHzEhTLShrpEuTXUmKr0F_8oKXdHOzOChSETYzQw7V7vRfVa1vGEZJ859V_SxaOOkD-LvoJ2xPO7Jjs2YQaZHYM1o6w?width=587&height=848&cropmode=none)

(https://v0hjvq-bn1305.files.1drv.com/y4mxOYTDlSo1OR-ZUHvEXfiWvnvGAozR-j6q3zIHTiHuyDUUV3EM-nXwaKv-roLXPsoo7PrsCEASZjzlnNK_lEHJs4XB0Y9U5okfUQdOsx7BF14ZBzYPnW1_fkAlLQ_rrR5QVys4kzPqccSwtv3cq8NszUTvgI7OPnghtVEt6Bg9EetNB-SDxYDSPrgZcUE3OJPFKrPXjq2dpg__Q3KOAnTdA?width=587&height=848&cropmode=none)

(https://vkhjvq-bn1305.files.1drv.com/y4mAJHH7ywaHHL3ERGo3hWUKz-2JUOJEWHT7IzuMx35Ha4VuN6scajrY-8J4SZwPwZFv9PMqUF6b8JGOhKJ9SyDMFkdZlGz9rA6Kb8xt6TR0Ute2tu5GPm8orG11sxvi5-s10OKReMciKhqKXDE4TrQeJzcQBdzjx5iHMo2wpYotwZp5WDqKXZid1m975aW97k6yxz7np4nwESwf6DCNM82XQ?width=589&height=816&cropmode=none)

(https://tuhjvq-bn1305.files.1drv.com/y4m4uI0EG5QwwN5DLU1m6u9LnflelnaCPuemaK7OW5IgXRF96fBFn2ZqubolpqAVJnzx5ykvm4beui2T8coIjYSiCmewRfNpD0kf9TFgBLm2AGv9VUz3Euo0VEwtNbEaDrQN0cbWFilqFwuXDTioKGKQq947BkFgCbhJgYt9s8FMxYsZhSlpO7p1rt7Tp0s2_0LESPOGEbP_biUp_3TN--ygQ?width=595&height=810&cropmode=none)

Cheers,

Title: Re: Steve McQueen rates the bikes of ‘66
Post by: skypig on November 20, 2017, 07:48:14 pm

Very cool.
Thanks

Title: Re: Steve McQueen rates the bikes of ‘66
Post by: Tahitian_Red on November 21, 2017, 03:57:58 am

What would Steve think (if he was still alive) about the portly 240lb Suzuki RMZ450?