OzVMX Forum

Clubroom => Competition => Topic started by: pmcburney on March 14, 2011, 09:36:08 am

Title: EVO regs question...
Post by: pmcburney on March 14, 2011, 09:36:08 am
The front brake on my '81 KTM 495 is marginal to say the least.


I'm working on improving it, but being only recently completely refurbished it likely needs more time to bed in.

I've been pondering some alternatives at the same time - a couple of questions for the EVO competitors out there:
Would my bike still qualify in the EVO class if I fitted (say) a twin-leading front brake from an IT or YZ?
Is there anything in the regs that prohibit retro-fitting a drum brake with hydraulics - i.e. using a master/slave cylinder arrangement instead of a cable?


Cheers
Paul
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: mainline on March 14, 2011, 09:46:15 am
Is the part you want to use from an evo legal bike? It's that simple.
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: vandy010 on March 14, 2011, 09:46:22 am
i'd reckon the  std YZ front brake would be legal but once you start hooking up hydraulics, forget it.
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: Slakewell on March 14, 2011, 10:24:54 am
There are smart ways to fix the cable problem and the 495 front brake can be made to work OK but not Yamaha good. KTM also a twin front brake. There are braking tips on thsi web site to look up.
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: JohnnyO on March 14, 2011, 11:53:04 am
How do you plan to run a hydraulic drum brake?? Please explain..
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: pmcburney on March 14, 2011, 12:46:09 pm
How do you plan to run a hydraulic drum brake?? Please explain..

Well, I was thinking it would be possible with a normal (modern) disc brake master cylinder connected to a suitable slave cylinder down on or near the drum brake actuating lever.

Then (having figured out the correct hydraulic ratio) set up to push on the drum actuating lever and voila!

I was thinking you could get much more leverage against the brake lever hydraulicly than you ever could by hand via a cable.

Mind you, if it was legal and it worked, well I suppose everyone would do it...
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: BAHNZY on March 14, 2011, 03:31:52 pm
How do you plan to run a hydraulic drum brake?? Please explain..

John,
It's been done before. You use a Magura clutch cylinder mounted to the front brake backing plate then set it up like any normal hydraulic front brake brake assembly. I have also seen a similar thing done to a Husky auto with a drum brake rear end. The rider had two bung (surgically fused) ankles and had the rear brake set up where the clutch would be and had only hand controls on the bike.

Vandy010,
Whether it is legal is a tough one as the GCR's dont clearly define these systems. There are EVO & Pre85 bikes getting around with;
- Magura hydraulic clutch conversions,
- Billett front & rear brake backing plates,
- PD valves in forks,
and most turn a blind eye to these.

Rod
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: JohnnyO on March 14, 2011, 04:02:53 pm
How do you plan to run a hydraulic drum brake?? Please explain..

Well, I was thinking it would be possible with a normal (modern) disc brake master cylinder connected to a suitable slave cylinder down on or near the drum brake actuating lever.

Then (having figured out the correct hydraulic ratio) set up to push on the drum actuating lever and voila!

I was thinking you could get much more leverage against the brake lever hydraulicly than you ever could by hand via a cable.

Mind you, if it was legal and it worked, well I suppose everyone would do it...

Firstly it wouldn't be legal in Evo because it didn't come out on any Evo era bikes.. plus it seems like a lot of work for little gain.
You could legally run a twin leading shoe yamaha wheel and brake from a YZ465 if you wished, i run that setup on my 490 Maico.
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: VMX247 on March 14, 2011, 04:31:38 pm
and most turn a blind eye to these.
Rod

time to stop turning a blind eye --why let it go on, when they will just push for the next rule to bend.

Firstly it wouldn't be legal in Evo because it didn't come out on any Evo era bikes..

Best answer yet !!  8)

cheers A
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: Slakewell on March 14, 2011, 05:06:20 pm
Quality cable (Yamaha) well setup with some shrink fit and good guides plus good controls are all one needs. There are twin leading shoe backing plates on ebay.
You can fit Honda Clutch plates to your 495 which help heaps plus I'm working on casting some new parts to make the clutch work as they should.
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: LWC82PE on March 14, 2011, 05:18:28 pm
Are there any hydraulic slave cylinders that were available back in the day eg pre 85? Ok so a modern magura one is illegal, but what if you built up a system using hydraulic bits available back then? I dont know if its possible to do or if there was any slave cylinders available back then? maybe somethign off a car, road bike, or tractor/ag equipment? I reckon there could be a legal way to do it maybe but like others said, it would be easier to fit a yamaha or Honda TLS brake.
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: sa63 on March 14, 2011, 06:00:43 pm
the best cheap fix is to take the wheel and brake to a brake place and get them to do a set of shoes in soft or woven linings arc'ed to your wheel. this will cost you about $40. All brake and clutch in rocklea if you are in Bris. we dont ride the old ones enough to bed in ebc or other after market shoes.
A beefy brake cable and an extended arm on the backing plate will also work wonders
If thats not good enough for you then look at the yamaha hub(the best for sure)
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: pmcburney on March 14, 2011, 06:29:53 pm
Thanks for all the advice...


Ok, so the hydraulic idea probably won't fly. Alright to investigate if I was never going to race it, perhaps.

Say I find an '84 KTM twin-leading setup and adapt it to fit my '81 forks, would that actually be EVO kosher?
The '84 KTM 495 is not an EVO class bike...

Or because YZ Yamahas had twin-leaders in '81, it would pass scrutiny?
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: BAHNZY on March 14, 2011, 07:04:56 pm
Firstly it wouldn't be legal in Evo because it didn't come out on any Evo era bikes. plus it seems like a lot of work for little gain.
You could legally run a twin leading shoe yamaha wheel and brake from a YZ465 if you wished, i run that setup on my 490 Maico.

John,
This is where the EVOLUTION regs fall down. In nearly all cases, the GCR's refer to a specified time in the past, whereas EVO locks in a technology/specification, not an ERA. An example of this is where you have pointed out that a YZ465 43mm front end & brake is a great alternative, yet an almost identical spec 83/84 RM 43mm twin leading front end is not, simply because the RM had a linkage rear end.

Rod
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: JohnnyO on March 14, 2011, 07:13:54 pm
Thanks for all the advice...


Ok, so the hydraulic idea probably won't fly. Alright to investigate if I was never going to race it, perhaps.

Say I find an '84 KTM twin-leading setup and adapt it to fit my '81 forks, would that actually be EVO kosher?
The '84 KTM 495 is not an EVO class bike...

Or because YZ Yamahas had twin-leaders in '8
1, it would pass scrutiny?
The parts have to come from an Evo bike... quite simple really ;)
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: mainline on March 14, 2011, 07:35:17 pm
Is the part you want to use from an evo legal bike? It's that simple.

as stated in answer #1 ;)

not wanting to start another 10 page thread on this, but how much more simple can it be?

Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: pmcburney on March 14, 2011, 07:52:36 pm
Is the part you want to use from an evo legal bike? It's that simple.

as stated in answer #1 ;)

not wanting to start another 10 page thread on this, but how much more simple can it be?



I get it.


Just trying to get a feel for how it plays out in the real world - at the track, as opposed to in the 'rule' book.

Just because you've set your bike up to the absolute letter does not mean someone next to you hasn't, and gets through.
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: JohnnyO on March 14, 2011, 07:54:38 pm
Is the part you want to use from an evo legal bike? It's that simple.

as stated in answer #1 ;)

not wanting to start another 10 page thread on this, but how much more simple can it be?



I get it.


Just trying to get a feel for how it plays out in the real world - at the track, as opposed to in the 'rule' book.

Just because you've set your bike up to the absolute letter does not mean someone next to you hasn't, and gets through.
The Evo police are very sharp at the track!!
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: mainline on March 14, 2011, 08:13:24 pm
It's not that, I wouldn't know something wasn't kosher unless you told me. And I really don't have a prob with tinkering with stuff to make it better. It's just that I think the evo class is pretty simple rule-wise
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: worms on March 14, 2011, 08:47:31 pm
OEM, now this is where our great mate Magoo would enter.

cheers
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: pmcburney on March 17, 2011, 11:20:18 am
Ok, so YZ/IT stuff is legit in EVO.


Does anyone know whether said YZ/IT brake plate can be modified or will fit straight in the KTM front hub, or will I have to source a YZ/IT hub/wheel?
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: micks on March 17, 2011, 03:28:37 pm
worms how true is that!! it was his pet hate and i think he would of pushed thru a rule change if he was arounded.
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: LWC82PE on March 17, 2011, 05:07:18 pm
The yamaha brakes are 130mm diameter. They can be modified to a certain degree but because they are magnesium, it makes welding on them not so easy. Im not sure if all the honda ones magnesium either. Suzukis are. I suggest hoping on ebay and loking at some photos of some brake plates. Even just buy a Yamaha one, once you have it in the flesh you will know if you can make it work or not. If its no good, dont worry guys on here are always looking for those brakes and you can re sell it on here easy. Another option is to turn a single leading brake into a twin leading by adding an extra pivot and arm. It can be done, by either changing or modifying the shoes & adding a secton piviot cam and modifying the cams. There is info on the web how to do it and i have seen it done on bikes before. Going to do it myself infact.

Also be aware there are 2 different Yamaha TLS brakes for YZ/IT. One is harder to get than the other
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: pmcburney on March 18, 2011, 09:01:42 am
the best cheap fix is to take the wheel and brake to a brake place and get them to do a set of shoes in soft or woven linings arc'ed to your wheel. this will cost you about $40. All brake and clutch in rocklea if you are in Bris. we dont ride the old ones enough to bed in ebc or other after market shoes.
A beefy brake cable and an extended arm on the backing plate will also work wonders
If thats not good enough for you then look at the yamaha hub(the best for sure)

Thanks for that - I'll give these guys a call.

At least I won't have to look like Popeye to get my front brake to work.

I have managed to track down a TLS Yamaha plate. When it arrives I'll attempt to fit it up to the OEM KTM hub and see how it goes as well.
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: Husabergpete on March 27, 2011, 08:09:59 am
PM sent about a good original KTM front brake in race service now . No Hydraulics attached.
Title: Re: EVO regs question...
Post by: evo550 on March 27, 2011, 08:19:21 am
Not to get too technical, but not all Yamaha TLS brakes are evo legal. :)
You need to get the backing plate with the brake stay lug is on about a 45 degree angle to the ground, in '82 (pre 85 era) they changed the lug position to be paralell to the ground.